FRAF
Price
$47.25
Change
+$0.23 (+0.49%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
211.52M
FSGB
Price
$9.43
Change
+$0.23 (+2.50%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs FSGB

Header iconFRAF vs FSGB Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs FSGBBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$47.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.49%)
Volume$10.92K
Capitalization211.52M
First Federal of South Carolina Federal Savings Bank
Price$9.43
Change+$0.23 (+2.50%)
Volume$400
Capitalization9.55M
FRAF vs FSGB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. FSGB commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a Buy and FSGB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $47.25 vs. FSGB: $9.43)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and FSGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 43% vs. FSGB: 143%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $211.52M vs. FSGB: $9.55M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $211.52M. FSGB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFSGB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FSGB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than FSGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSGB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSGB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the short-term than FSGB.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.18% price change this week, while FSGB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRAF($212M) has a higher market cap than FSGB($9.55M). FRAF has higher P/E ratio than FSGB: FRAF (14.41) vs FSGB (12.08). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 62.117 vs. FSGB (-1.823).
FRAFFSGBFRAF / FSGB
Capitalization212M9.55M2,221%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD62.117-1.823-3,408%
P/E Ratio14.4112.08119%
Revenue76.1MN/A-
Total Cash23.3MN/A-
Total Debt224MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs FSGB: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
FSGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12100
SMR RATING
1..100
51100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1995
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSGB's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FRAF (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSGB’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSGB (100) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSGB (100) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSGB (59) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSGB (95) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFFSGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAK3.530.12
+3.52%
Braskem SA
BEEM2.490.05
+2.05%
Beam Global
TCMD13.460.04
+0.30%
Tactile Systems Technology
BYD86.46-0.01
-0.01%
Boyd Gaming Corp
CVX153.66-4.03
-2.56%
Chevron Corp

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+0.49%
WNEB - FRAF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
FUNC - FRAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
MRBK - FRAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
CWBC - FRAF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
UBFO - FRAF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
More

FSGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSGB has been loosely correlated with APLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSGB jumps, then APLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSGB
1D Price
Change %
FSGB100%
N/A
APLO - FSGB
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMTDF - FSGB
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ANDC - FSGB
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
FRAF - FSGB
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
CTYP - FSGB
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More