FRACF
Price
$1.56
Change
+$0.01 (+0.65%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
154.78M
GARWF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRACF vs GARWF

Header iconFRACF vs GARWF Comparison
Open Charts FRACF vs GARWFBanner chart's image
Foraco International, Marseille
Price$1.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.65%)
Volume$16.01K
Capitalization154.78M
Golden Arrow Resource
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$27.83K
Capitalization8.44M
FRACF vs GARWF Comparison Chart in %
FRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GARWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRACF vs. GARWF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRACF is a Hold and GARWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FRACF: $1.56 vs. GARWF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: FRACF and GARWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRACF: 520% vs. GARWF: 45%
Market capitalization -- FRACF: $154.78M vs. GARWF: $8.44M
FRACF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $154.78M. GARWF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $8.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGARWF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GARWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRACF is a better buy in the long-term than GARWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRACF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GARWF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRACF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GARWF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRACF is a better buy in the short-term than GARWF.

Price Growth

FRACF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while GARWF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -5.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +253.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRACF($155M) has a higher market cap than GARWF($8.44M). GARWF YTD gains are higher at: 50.376 vs. FRACF (-8.889). FRACF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.9M vs. GARWF (-6.67M). FRACF has more cash in the bank: 20.8M vs. GARWF (1.03M). GARWF has less debt than FRACF: GARWF (0) vs FRACF (97.3M). FRACF has higher revenues than GARWF: FRACF (263M) vs GARWF (0).
FRACFGARWFFRACF / GARWF
Capitalization155M8.44M1,836%
EBITDA46.9M-6.67M-703%
Gain YTD-8.88950.376-18%
P/E Ratio8.14N/A-
Revenue263M0-
Total Cash20.8M1.03M2,014%
Total Debt97.3M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRACF vs GARWF: Fundamental Ratings
FRACF
GARWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45100
SMR RATING
1..100
4299
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2065
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GARWF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FRACF (68). This means that GARWF’s stock grew similarly to FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GARWF (100). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GARWF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GARWF (99). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GARWF’s over the last 12 months.

GARWF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FRACF (49). This means that GARWF’s stock grew similarly to FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GARWF (65). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GARWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRACFGARWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GARWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DTEAF0.660.04
+6.69%
DAVIDsTEA Inc
HESAF2574.5043.50
+1.72%
Hermes International SA
ALNPY3.800.05
+1.33%
ANA Holdings Inc.
TOMYY29.15N/A
N/A
Tomy Co., Ltd.
DMXCF0.99-0.05
-4.93%
District Metals Corp.

FRACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRACF and SMMYY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRACF and SMMYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRACF
1D Price
Change %
FRACF100%
+0.35%
SMMYY - FRACF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
FSUGY - FRACF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
FSUMF - FRACF
19%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
FWEDF - FRACF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%
GARWF - FRACF
4%
Poorly correlated
-14.25%
More

GARWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GARWF and FSUMF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GARWF and FSUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GARWF
1D Price
Change %
GARWF100%
-14.25%
FSUMF - GARWF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
FWEDF - GARWF
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%
FTMDF - GARWF
8%
Poorly correlated
-8.86%
GCCFF - GARWF
5%
Poorly correlated
+6.51%
FRACF - GARWF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More