FRACF
Price
$1.59
Change
+$0.01 (+0.63%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
158.06M
FTMDF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
29.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRACF vs FTMDF

Header iconFRACF vs FTMDF Comparison
Open Charts FRACF vs FTMDFBanner chart's image
Foraco International, Marseille
Price$1.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.63%)
Volume$30K
Capitalization158.06M
Fortune Minerals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$62K
Capitalization29.1M
FRACF vs FTMDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRACF vs. FTMDF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRACF is a Buy and FTMDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FRACF: $1.59 vs. FTMDF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: FRACF and FTMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRACF: 1039% vs. FTMDF: 95%
Market capitalization -- FRACF: $158.06M vs. FTMDF: $29.1M
FRACF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $158.06M. FTMDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $29.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRACF is a better buy in the long-term than FTMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRACF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTMDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRACF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FTMDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRACF is a better buy in the short-term than FTMDF.

Price Growth

FRACF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.43% price change this week, while FTMDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRACF($158M) has a higher market cap than FTMDF($29.1M). FTMDF YTD gains are higher at: 54.416 vs. FRACF (-7.018). FRACF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.9M vs. FTMDF (-3.43M). FRACF has more cash in the bank: 20.8M vs. FTMDF (462K). FTMDF has less debt than FRACF: FTMDF (12.6M) vs FRACF (97.3M). FRACF has higher revenues than FTMDF: FRACF (263M) vs FTMDF (0).
FRACFFTMDFFRACF / FTMDF
Capitalization158M29.1M543%
EBITDA46.9M-3.43M-1,366%
Gain YTD-7.01854.416-13%
P/E Ratio8.30N/A-
Revenue263M0-
Total Cash20.8M462K4,502%
Total Debt97.3M12.6M772%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRACF vs FTMDF: Fundamental Ratings
FRACF
FTMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44100
SMR RATING
1..100
4396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1347
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
759

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRACF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (94). This means that FRACF’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTMDF (100). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTMDF (96). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (54). This means that FRACF’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTMDF (47). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRACFFTMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKEAY1.50N/A
N/A
Bank of East Asia Limited
RYBIF17.08N/A
N/A
Ryobi Ltd.
CLPHY8.23-0.01
-0.06%
CLP Holdings Ltd.
PVBK10.59-0.01
-0.09%
Pacific Valley Bancorp
SGTM0.03N/A
-6.04%
Sustainable Green Team, Ltd.

FTMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTMDF and CASXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTMDF and CASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTMDF
1D Price
Change %
FTMDF100%
-3.73%
CASXF - FTMDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KCCFF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
ORMNF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.03%
FRACF - FTMDF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARWF - FTMDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
More