FRACF
Price
$1.26
Change
-$0.02 (-1.56%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
135.91M
FTMDF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
31.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRACF vs FTMDF

Header iconFRACF vs FTMDF Comparison
Open Charts FRACF vs FTMDFBanner chart's image
Foraco International, Marseille
Price$1.26
Change-$0.02 (-1.56%)
Volume$100
Capitalization135.91M
Fortune Minerals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$6.03K
Capitalization31.17M
FRACF vs FTMDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRACF vs. FTMDF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRACF is a Hold and FTMDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FRACF: $1.26 vs. FTMDF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: FRACF and FTMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRACF: 6% vs. FTMDF: 8%
Market capitalization -- FRACF: $135.91M vs. FTMDF: $31.17M
FRACF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $135.91M. FTMDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $31.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRACF is a better buy in the long-term than FTMDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRACF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTMDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRACF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FTMDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTMDF is a better buy in the short-term than FRACF.

Price Growth

FRACF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FTMDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +20.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.88% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRACF($136M) has a higher market cap than FTMDF($31.2M). FTMDF YTD gains are higher at: 85.185 vs. FRACF (-26.023). FRACF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.9M vs. FTMDF (-2.75M). FRACF has more cash in the bank: 20.8M vs. FTMDF (1.09M). FTMDF has less debt than FRACF: FTMDF (12.6M) vs FRACF (97.3M). FRACF has higher revenues than FTMDF: FRACF (263M) vs FTMDF (0).
FRACFFTMDFFRACF / FTMDF
Capitalization136M31.2M436%
EBITDA46.9M-2.75M-1,705%
Gain YTD-26.02385.185-31%
P/E Ratio6.61N/A-
Revenue263M0-
Total Cash20.8M1.09M1,903%
Total Debt97.3M12.6M772%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRACF vs FTMDF: Fundamental Ratings
FRACF
FTMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8883
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4993
SMR RATING
1..100
4395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3351
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRACF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (94). This means that FRACF’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTMDF (93). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTMDF (95). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTMDF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRACF (81). This means that FTMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as FTMDF (51). This means that FRACF’s stock grew similarly to FTMDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRACFFTMDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AREDX25.940.12
+0.46%
American Century Real Estate R6
RYRAX53.720.01
+0.02%
Rydex Retailing H
RLISX24.73-0.03
-0.12%
Russell Inv Equity Income S
OPTIX109.97-0.22
-0.20%
Invesco Discovery Large Cap R6
GGFRX15.16-0.06
-0.39%
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core R

FRACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRACF and STRPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRACF and STRPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRACF
1D Price
Change %
FRACF100%
N/A
STRPF - FRACF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
MALRY - FRACF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
FSUMF - FRACF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
FSUGY - FRACF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
FTMDF - FRACF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
More

FTMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FTMDF and CASXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FTMDF and CASXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTMDF
1D Price
Change %
FTMDF100%
-0.33%
CASXF - FTMDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KCCFF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
ORMNF - FTMDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRACF - FTMDF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARWF - FTMDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
More