FQVTF
Price
$12.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.01B
UPCHY
Price
$116.84
Change
-$10.41 (-8.18%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.73B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FQVTF vs UPCHY

Header iconFQVTF vs UPCHY Comparison
Open Charts FQVTF vs UPCHYBanner chart's image
Fevertree Drinks
Price$12.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$961
Capitalization2.01B
Uni-President China Holdings
Price$116.84
Change-$10.41 (-8.18%)
Volume$2
Capitalization3.73B
FQVTF vs UPCHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FQVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPCHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FQVTF vs. UPCHY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQVTF is a Hold and UPCHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FQVTF: $12.70 vs. UPCHY: $116.84)
Brand notoriety: FQVTF and UPCHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FQVTF: 13% vs. UPCHY: 80%
Market capitalization -- FQVTF: $2.01B vs. UPCHY: $3.73B
FQVTF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $2.01B. UPCHY’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $3.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $24.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FQVTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUPCHY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FQVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UPCHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPCHY is a better buy in the long-term than FQVTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FQVTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPCHY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FQVTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UPCHY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FQVTF is a better buy in the short-term than UPCHY.

Price Growth

FQVTF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +1.60% price change this week, while UPCHY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +3.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+3.20% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPCHY($3.73B) has a higher market cap than FQVTF($2.01B). FQVTF has higher P/E ratio than UPCHY: FQVTF (65.79) vs UPCHY (21.10). FQVTF YTD gains are higher at: 49.588 vs. UPCHY (23.986). UPCHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.93B vs. FQVTF (52.7M). UPCHY has higher revenues than FQVTF: UPCHY (28.3B) vs FQVTF (330M).
FQVTFUPCHYFQVTF / UPCHY
Capitalization2.01B3.73B54%
EBITDA52.7M2.93B2%
Gain YTD49.58823.986207%
P/E Ratio65.7921.10312%
Revenue330M28.3B1%
Total Cash100MN/A-
Total Debt2.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FQVTF vs UPCHY: Fundamental Ratings
FQVTF
UPCHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
5419
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9442
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UPCHY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FQVTF (52). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FQVTF (100). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FQVTF (54). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVTF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as UPCHY (46). This means that FQVTF’s stock grew similarly to UPCHY’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FQVTF (94). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FQVTFUPCHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FQVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UPCHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRCS25.840.26
+1.02%
Parnassus Core Select ETF
INQQ16.520.11
+0.69%
INQQ The India Internet ETF
FJAN47.960.20
+0.41%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jan
SNPD26.900.06
+0.23%
Xtrackers S&P Div Arstcrts Scrn ETF
NUW13.72-0.01
-0.07%
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund

FQVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FQVTF and SHOT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FQVTF and SHOT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FQVTF
1D Price
Change %
FQVTF100%
N/A
SHOT - FQVTF
11%
Poorly correlated
-8.69%
UPCHY - FQVTF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMBVF - FQVTF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
MOJO - FQVTF
3%
Poorly correlated
+19.54%
LSDAF - FQVTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UPCHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UPCHY and JSDA have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPCHY and JSDA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPCHY
1D Price
Change %
UPCHY100%
N/A
JSDA - UPCHY
10%
Poorly correlated
+7.30%
FQVTF - UPCHY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YKLTY - UPCHY
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
NTEI - UPCHY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSDAF - UPCHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More