Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs VSTSX
FQUAX vs VSTSX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs VSTSX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
Price$20.88
Change-$0.11 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.12M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Instl Sel
Price$316.26
Change-$5.64 (-1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
FQUAX vs VSTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. VSTSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a StrongBuy and VSTSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSTSX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. FQUAX (47.1M). VSTSX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: VSTSX (1.13) vs FQUAX (0.53). FQUAX was incepted earlier than VSTSX: FQUAX (20 years) vs VSTSX (9 years). FQUAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than VSTSX (0.01). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. VSTSX (2.00). FQUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSTSX: FQUAX (2000) vs VSTSX (5000000000). VSTSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. FQUAX (-2.13). VSTSX return over 5 years is better than : 80.90 vs. FQUAX (71.40).
| FQUAX | VSTSX | FQUAX / VSTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.01 | 9,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.01 | 11,500% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.741 | 13.963 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.1M | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.13 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.13 | 11.53 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 66.99 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.40 | 80.90 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement