Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs VITSX
FQUAX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs VITSX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
Price$21.15
Change+$0.12 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$150.04
Change+$1.28 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
FQUAX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. VITSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. FQUAX (50.8M). VITSX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: VITSX (1.22) vs FQUAX (0.52). FQUAX was incepted earlier than VITSX: FQUAX (19 years) vs VITSX (28 years). FQUAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). FQUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: FQUAX (2000) vs VITSX (5000000). FQUAX (14.18) and VITSX (13.90) have marching annual gain over last year. VITSX (95.64) and FQUAX (92.27) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FQUAX | VITSX | FQUAX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.03 | 3,167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.03 | 3,833% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.539 | 6.423 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.8M | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.22 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.18 | 13.90 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.68 | 62.12 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.27 | 95.64 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.18 | 198.64 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement