Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWMFX
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWMFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
Price$21.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.65M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. FQUAX (50.6M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWMFX (1.43) vs FQUAX (0.51). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FQUAX (20 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). FQUAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWMFX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. FQUAX (6.41). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 84.47 vs. RWMFX (50.81).
| FQUAX | RWMFX | FQUAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.31 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.31 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.539 | 8.213 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.6M | 205B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.43 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 7.95 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.42 | 34.82 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.47 | 50.81 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.34 | 83.34 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement