Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWMFX
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWMFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
Price$19.53
Change-$1.33 (-6.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.99M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. FQUAX (46M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWMFX (1.45) vs FQUAX (0.60). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FQUAX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FQUAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWMFX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. FQUAX (-6.05). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 57.64 vs. RWMFX (37.79).
| FQUAX | RWMFX | FQUAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.31 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.31 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.051 | 1.520 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.45 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.05 | 5.51 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.85 | 30.53 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.64 | 37.79 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.16 | 98.02 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement