Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWMFX
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWMFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
Price$19.83
Change+$0.10 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.43M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.88
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. FQUAX (47.4M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWMFX (1.38) vs FQUAX (0.51). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FQUAX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FQUAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWMFX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. FQUAX (-2.12). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.16 vs. RWMFX (42.34).
| FQUAX | RWMFX | FQUAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.31 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.31 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.048 | 8.297 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.38 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.12 | 6.45 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.81 | 33.08 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.16 | 42.34 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.79 | 82.48 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement