Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWEBX
FQUAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWEBX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
Price$19.83
Change+$0.10 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.43M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.45
Change+$0.26 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
FQUAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. FQUAX (47.4M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWEBX (0.74) vs FQUAX (0.51). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: FQUAX (20 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). FQUAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWEBX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.80 vs. FQUAX (-2.12). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.16 vs. RWEBX (38.17).
| FQUAX | RWEBX | FQUAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.06 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.06 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.048 | 7.648 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.74 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.12 | 5.80 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.81 | 30.20 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.16 | 38.17 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.79 | 76.44 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement