Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWEBX
FQUAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWEBX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
Price$19.53
Change-$1.33 (-6.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.99M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.66
Change-$1.07 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
FQUAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. FQUAX (46M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWEBX (0.78) vs FQUAX (0.60). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: FQUAX (20 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). FQUAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWEBX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.66 vs. FQUAX (-6.05). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 57.64 vs. RWEBX (33.53).
| FQUAX | RWEBX | FQUAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.06 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.06 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.051 | 1.452 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.78 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.05 | 4.66 | -130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.85 | 27.48 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.64 | 33.53 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.16 | 91.10 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement