Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWEBX
FQUAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWEBX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
Price$21.15
Change-$0.06 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.07M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.96
Change-$0.14 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.49B
FQUAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. FQUAX (49.1M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWEBX (0.79) vs FQUAX (0.52). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: FQUAX (19 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). FQUAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWEBX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). FQUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.32 vs. RWEBX (5.78). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 85.95 vs. RWEBX (45.78).
| FQUAX | RWEBX | FQUAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.06 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.06 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.539 | 6.649 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.1M | 203B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.79 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.32 | 5.78 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.30 | 21.78 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.95 | 45.78 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.86 | 65.35 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement