Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQTEX vs RIDCX
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.60
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.3M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R3
Price$27.37
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.61B
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a Hold and RIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FQTEX (437M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDCX: FQTEX (6.09) vs RIDCX (3.27). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDCX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDCX (23 years). RIDCX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDCX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.82 vs. RIDCX (8.83). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 73.52 vs. RIDCX (39.01).
| FQTEX | RIDCX | FQTEX / RIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.90 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.139 | 14.553 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.09 | 3.27 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.82 | 8.83 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.94 | 36.66 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.52 | 39.01 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement