Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQTEX vs RIDCX
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets454.11M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R3
Price$27.50
Change-$0.20 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.2B
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a Hold and RIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FQTEX (454M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDCX: FQTEX (6.39) vs RIDCX (3.29). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDCX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDCX (23 years). RIDCX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDCX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.22 vs. RIDCX (11.29). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.69 vs. RIDCX (36.99).
| FQTEX | RIDCX | FQTEX / RIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.90 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.653 | 15.934 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.39 | 3.29 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.22 | 11.29 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.79 | 29.78 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.69 | 36.99 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers