Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQTEX vs RIDAX
FQTEX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDAX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets454.11M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1
Price$27.41
Change-$0.20 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.2B
FQTEX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a Hold and RIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FQTEX (454M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDAX: FQTEX (6.39) vs RIDAX (2.89). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDAX (23 years). RIDAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDAX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDAX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.22 vs. RIDAX (10.80). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.69 vs. RIDAX (34.52).
| FQTEX | RIDAX | FQTEX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.34 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.34 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.653 | 15.476 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.39 | 2.89 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.22 | 10.80 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.79 | 28.18 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.69 | 34.52 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement