Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQTEX vs RIDAX
FQTEX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDAX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.60
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.3M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1
Price$27.30
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.61B
FQTEX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a Hold and RIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FQTEX (437M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDAX: FQTEX (6.09) vs RIDAX (2.87). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDAX (23 years). RIDAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDAX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDAX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.82 vs. RIDAX (8.34). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 73.52 vs. RIDAX (36.54).
| FQTEX | RIDAX | FQTEX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.34 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.34 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.139 | 14.180 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.09 | 2.87 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.82 | 8.34 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.94 | 35.03 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.52 | 36.54 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement