Intraday BUY SELL Signals
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQAL vs PH
FQAL vs PH Comparison
Open Charts FQAL vs PH
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Price$76.03
Change-$0.29 (-0.38%)
Volume$1.04K
Net Assets1.17B
Parker-Hannifin
Price$962.89
Change-$1.44 (-0.15%)
Volume$458
Capitalization121.71B
FQAL vs PH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQAL vs. PH commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQAL is a Hold and PH is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PH: Fundamental Ratings
PH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FQAL | PH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQAL has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FQAL jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| PH - FQAL | 81% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| MCO - FQAL | 78% Closely correlated | -8.90% | ||
| BX - FQAL | 78% Closely correlated | -5.24% | ||
| CPAY - FQAL | 76% Closely correlated | -4.15% | ||
| AMP - FQAL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
More | ||||
PH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PH has been closely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PH jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y