Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPX vs IMCG
FPX vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts FPX vs IMCG
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
Price$143.86
Change+$1.81 (+1.27%)
Volume$23.06K
Net Assets955.8M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$81.29
Change+$0.83 (+1.03%)
Volume$51.64K
Net Assets2.84B
FPX vs IMCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPX vs. IMCG commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPX is a Hold and IMCG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.84B vs. FPX (956M). FPX has a higher annual dividend yield than IMCG: FPX (20.462) vs IMCG (7.995). FPX was incepted earlier than IMCG: FPX (19 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FPX (0.59). FPX has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| FPX | IMCG | FPX / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | 20.462 | 7.995 | 256% |
| Net Assets | 956M | 2.84B | 34% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.06 | 983% |
| Turnover | 77.00 | 43.00 | 179% |
| Yield | 0.14 | 0.75 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FPX | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FPX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FPX has been closely correlated with OWL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FPX jumps, then OWL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FPX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPX | 100% | +1.27% | ||
| OWL - FPX | 78% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| SOFI - FPX | 77% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| STEP - FPX | 77% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| COHR - FPX | 76% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| VRT - FPX | 76% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||