FPX | IMCG | FPX / IMCG | |
Gain YTD | -2.772 | -5.615 | 49% |
Net Assets | 764M | 2.47B | 31% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.06 | 983% |
Turnover | 77.00 | 43.00 | 179% |
Yield | 0.10 | 0.81 | 12% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 21 years | - |
FPX | IMCG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago90% | 6 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago84% | 6 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago81% | 6 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago87% | 6 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago83% | 6 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago83% | 6 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago87% | 13 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago81% | 20 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago90% | 6 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FPX has been closely correlated with OWL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FPX jumps, then OWL could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IMCG | 100% | +2.46% | ||
FTV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
ARES - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +4.81% | ||
JEF - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | +3.29% | ||
HLT - IMCG | 77% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
OWL - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | +4.53% | ||
More |