FPRGF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
33.8M
MGPHF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
23.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FPRGF vs MGPHF

Header iconFPRGF vs MGPHF Comparison
Open Charts FPRGF vs MGPHFBanner chart's image
Falco Resources
Price$0.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$122.6K
Capitalization33.8M
Mason Resources
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$84.3K
Capitalization23.98M
FPRGF vs MGPHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPRGF vs. MGPHF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPRGF is a Hold and MGPHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FPRGF: $0.23 vs. MGPHF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: FPRGF and MGPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPRGF: 974% vs. MGPHF: 151%
Market capitalization -- FPRGF: $33.8M vs. MGPHF: $23.98M
FPRGF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $33.8M. MGPHF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $23.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPRGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGPHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FPRGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPRGF is a better buy in the long-term than MGPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPRGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGPHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FPRGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGPHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGPHF is a better buy in the short-term than FPRGF.

Price Growth

FPRGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +34.27% price change this week, while MGPHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPRGF($33.8M) has a higher market cap than MGPHF($24M). MGPHF YTD gains are higher at: 65.237 vs. FPRGF (21.053). FPRGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.32M vs. MGPHF (-3.96M). MGPHF has more cash in the bank: 8.22M vs. FPRGF (6.78M). MGPHF has less debt than FPRGF: MGPHF (3.88M) vs FPRGF (32.3M). FPRGF (0) and MGPHF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FPRGFMGPHFFPRGF / MGPHF
Capitalization33.8M24M141%
EBITDA-2.32M-3.96M59%
Gain YTD21.05365.23732%
P/E RatioN/A8.82-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.78M8.22M83%
Total Debt32.3M3.88M832%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPRGF vs MGPHF: Fundamental Ratings
FPRGF
MGPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97100
SMR RATING
1..100
8994
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3157
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGPHF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FPRGF (71). This means that MGPHF’s stock grew similarly to FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (94). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (38). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (57). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPRGFMGPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZNOG0.20N/A
+2.46%
Zion Oil & Gas, Inc.
KUBR6.150.02
+0.33%
Kuber Resources Corporation
BDVB0.03N/A
N/A
Bagger Dave's Burger Tavern, Inc.
ELCPF4.41N/A
N/A
EDP S A
GRRMF56.75N/A
N/A
Gerresheimer AG

FPRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPRGF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPRGF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPRGF
1D Price
Change %
FPRGF100%
N/A
DCNNF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
CASXF - FPRGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-24.16%
TWOSF - FPRGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
ATBHF - FPRGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
MGPHF - FPRGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.34%
More

MGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPHF and FPRGF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPHF and FPRGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPHF
1D Price
Change %
MGPHF100%
+5.34%
FPRGF - MGPHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGAFF - MGPHF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
MALRF - MGPHF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELVUF - MGPHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+11.11%
MKRIF - MGPHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More