FPLPF
Price
$0.75
Change
+$0.04 (+5.63%)
Updated
Mar 31 closing price
Capitalization
408.46M
PRG
Price
$32.24
Change
+$0.89 (+2.84%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.27B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FPLPF vs PRG

Header iconFPLPF vs PRG Comparison
Open Charts FPLPF vs PRGBanner chart's image
VANQUIS BKG GROUP
Price$0.75
Change+$0.04 (+5.63%)
Volume$150
Capitalization408.46M
PROG Holdings
Price$32.24
Change+$0.89 (+2.84%)
Volume$3.42K
Capitalization1.27B
FPLPF vs PRG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPLPF vs. PRG commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPLPF is a Hold and PRG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FPLPF: $0.75 vs. PRG: $31.35)
Brand notoriety: FPLPF and PRG are both not notable
FPLPF represents the Regional Banks, while PRG is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPLPF: 100% vs. PRG: 129%
Market capitalization -- FPLPF: $408.33M vs. PRG: $1.27B
FPLPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $408.33M. PRG’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.83B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $55.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPLPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FPLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPLPF is a better buy in the long-term than PRG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PRG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FPLPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PRG (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.73%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

PRG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-1.49% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRG($1.27B) has a higher market cap than FPLPF($408M). FPLPF YTD gains are higher at: 9.103 vs. PRG (-25.135). FPLPF has less debt than PRG: FPLPF (442M) vs PRG (603M). PRG has higher revenues than FPLPF: PRG (2.52B) vs FPLPF (458M).
FPLPFPRGFPLPF / PRG
Capitalization408M1.27B32%
EBITDAN/A1.9B-
Gain YTD9.103-25.135-36%
P/E RatioN/A6.38-
Revenue458M2.52B18%
Total CashN/A222M-
Total Debt442M603M73%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRG: Fundamental Ratings
PRG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPLPFPRG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BWLIX24.640.23
+0.94%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value Inv
PIIOX13.010.07
+0.54%
Principal International Equity Index R3
SCIEX20.700.09
+0.44%
Hartford Schroders International Stk I
WEBCX10.540.03
+0.29%
TETON Westwood Balanced A
JNMCX15.800.03
+0.19%
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value D

FPLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPLPF and KNMOF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPLPF and KNMOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPLPF
1D Price
Change %
FPLPF100%
N/A
KNMOF - FPLPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMMFF - FPLPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRG - FPLPF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
OPFI - FPLPF
-6%
Poorly correlated
+3.96%
HTZ - FPLPF
-7%
Poorly correlated
-7.18%
More