Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPHAX vs JNGLX
FPHAX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPHAX vs. JNGLX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPHAX is a Buy and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.29B vs. FPHAX (1.08B). FPHAX pays higher dividends than JNGLX: FPHAX (1.29) vs JNGLX (0.34). FPHAX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FPHAX (24 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). JNGLX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FPHAX (0.67). FPHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FPHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FPHAX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.92 vs. FPHAX (-13.65). FPHAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.34 vs. JNGLX (9.94).
| FPHAX | JNGLX | FPHAX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.235 | 3.830 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 4.29B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.34 | 380% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.65 | -12.92 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.98 | 16.87 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.34 | 9.94 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.39 | 21.35 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement