Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPHAX vs JNGLX
FPHAX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPHAX vs. JNGLX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPHAX is a Buy and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.35B vs. FPHAX (1.11B). FPHAX pays higher dividends than JNGLX: FPHAX (1.36) vs JNGLX (0.36). FPHAX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FPHAX (24 years) vs JNGLX (26 years). JNGLX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FPHAX (0.67). FPHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FPHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FPHAX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.98 vs. FPHAX (-12.65). FPHAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.70 vs. JNGLX (13.58).
| FPHAX | JNGLX | FPHAX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.601 | -1.694 | -95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 4.35B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.36 | 374% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.65 | -11.98 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.13 | 20.71 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.70 | 13.58 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.56 | 12.35 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement