Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPHAX vs JNGLX
FPHAX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPHAX vs. JNGLX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPHAX is a Buy and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.35B vs. FPHAX (1.12B). FPHAX pays higher dividends than JNGLX: FPHAX (1.33) vs JNGLX (0.36). FPHAX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FPHAX (24 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). JNGLX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FPHAX (0.67). FPHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FPHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FPHAX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.75 vs. FPHAX (-14.20). FPHAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.06 vs. JNGLX (4.91).
| FPHAX | JNGLX | FPHAX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.040 | -2.563 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 4.35B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.36 | 374% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.20 | -11.75 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.61 | 9.32 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.06 | 4.91 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.95 | 10.95 | 91% |