Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPHAX vs JNGLX
FPHAX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPHAX vs. JNGLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPHAX is a Buy and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 5.36B vs. FPHAX (1.43B). FPHAX pays higher dividends than JNGLX: FPHAX (3.02) vs JNGLX (0.43). FPHAX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FPHAX (25 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). JNGLX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FPHAX (0.67). FPHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. JNGLX (30.00). FPHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FPHAX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). FPHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.51 vs. JNGLX (15.11). FPHAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.01 vs. JNGLX (15.42).
| FPHAX | JNGLX | FPHAX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.429 | 1.025 | 335% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 5.36B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 0.43 | 704% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.51 | 15.11 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.45 | 23.72 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.01 | 15.42 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.51 | 98.25 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement