FPH
Price
$5.57
Change
+$0.10 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jun 16, 12:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
218.29M
44 days until earnings call
JLL
Price
$241.15
Change
+$4.16 (+1.76%)
Updated
Jun 16, 01:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.03B
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FPH vs JLL

Header iconFPH vs JLL Comparison
Open Charts FPH vs JLLBanner chart's image
Five Point Holdings
Price$5.57
Change+$0.10 (+1.83%)
Volume$100
Capitalization218.29M
Jones Lang LaSalle
Price$241.15
Change+$4.16 (+1.76%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization9.03B
FPH vs JLL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPH vs. JLL commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPH is a Buy and JLL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FPH: $5.47 vs. JLL: $236.99)
Brand notoriety: FPH and JLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPH: 65% vs. JLL: 169%
Market capitalization -- FPH: $218.29M vs. JLL: $9.03B
FPH [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $218.29M. JLL’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $9.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJLL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JLL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPH is a better buy in the long-term than JLL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JLL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FPH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JLL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JLL is a better buy in the short-term than FPH.

Price Growth

FPH (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while JLL (@Real Estate Development) price change was +3.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

FPH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

JLL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.51% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JLL($9.03B) has a higher market cap than FPH($218M). JLL has higher P/E ratio than FPH: JLL (40.75) vs FPH (4.16). FPH YTD gains are higher at: 44.709 vs. JLL (-6.380). JLL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 916M vs. FPH (46.1M). JLL has more cash in the bank: 410M vs. FPH (354M). FPH has less debt than JLL: FPH (633M) vs JLL (3.12B). JLL has higher revenues than FPH: JLL (20.8B) vs FPH (212M).
FPHJLLFPH / JLL
Capitalization218M9.03B2%
EBITDA46.1M916M5%
Gain YTD44.709-6.380-701%
P/E Ratio4.1640.7510%
Revenue212M20.8B1%
Total Cash354M410M86%
Total Debt633M3.12B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPH vs JLL: Fundamental Ratings
FPH
JLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9843
SMR RATING
1..100
6094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2389
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JLL's Valuation (90) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FPH (94). This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to FPH’s over the last 12 months.

JLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPH (98). This means that JLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPH’s over the last 12 months.

FPH's SMR Rating (60) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JLL (94). This means that FPH’s stock grew somewhat faster than JLL’s over the last 12 months.

FPH's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (57). This means that FPH’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.

FPH's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for JLL (89). This means that FPH’s stock grew significantly faster than JLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPHJLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOAEX11.380.10
+0.89%
Spirit of America Energy A
HRMDX13.28-0.18
-1.34%
Heartland Mid Cap Value Investor
TMDPX16.55-0.23
-1.37%
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth N
MRGJX51.98-0.72
-1.37%
MFS Core Equity R4
FAPHX12.80-0.28
-2.14%
Fidelity Healthy Future

FPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPH and JLL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPH and JLL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPH
1D Price
Change %
FPH100%
-2.32%
JLL - FPH
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
CBRE - FPH
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
NMRK - FPH
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.13%
RMR - FPH
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
CWK - FPH
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
More

JLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JLL has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JLL jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JLL
1D Price
Change %
JLL100%
-1.90%
CBRE - JLL
87%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
CWK - JLL
83%
Closely correlated
-3.61%
NMRK - JLL
79%
Closely correlated
-4.13%
CIGI - JLL
74%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
MMI - JLL
65%
Loosely correlated
-4.08%
More