Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPGLX vs REDTX
FPGLX vs REDTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPGLX vs. REDTX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPGLX is a Hold and REDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.5B vs. FPGLX (2.04B). REDTX (2.66) and FPGLX (2.61) have matching dividends . FPGLX was incepted earlier than REDTX: FPGLX (8 years) vs REDTX (18 years). REDTX (0.36) is less costly to investors than FPGLX (0.34). FPGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. REDTX (10.00). FPGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than REDTX: FPGLX (0) vs REDTX (250). REDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. FPGLX (4.18). REDTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.40 vs. FPGLX (14.20).
| FPGLX | REDTX | FPGLX / REDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.36 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.36 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.738 | 6.033 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 32.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 2.66 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 7.77 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.92 | 25.23 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.20 | 23.40 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers