Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPGLX vs RBDTX
FPGLX vs RBDTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPGLX vs. RBDTX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPGLX is a Hold and RBDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.5B vs. FPGLX (2.04B). FPGLX pays higher dividends than RBDTX: FPGLX (2.61) vs RBDTX (1.72). FPGLX was incepted earlier than RBDTX: FPGLX (8 years) vs RBDTX (18 years). RBDTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FPGLX (0.34). FPGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RBDTX (10.00). FPGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBDTX: FPGLX (0) vs RBDTX (250). RBDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. FPGLX (4.18). RBDTX return over 5 years is better than : 17.89 vs. FPGLX (14.20).
| FPGLX | RBDTX | FPGLX / RBDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.40 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.40 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.738 | 5.495 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 32.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 1.72 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 6.50 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.92 | 21.81 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.20 | 17.89 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers