Advertisement
FPFD vs HBANP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPFD is a Hold and HBANP is a Hold.
HBANP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 58 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FPFD | HBANP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 29% | 3 days ago 37% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 28% | 3 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 37% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 41% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 53% | 10 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 31% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MNNAX | 64.07 | 0.25 | +0.39% |
| Victory Munder Multi-Cap A | |||
| UIVCX | 12.76 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
| MFS Intrinsic Value C | |||
| JIERX | 23.20 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| JPMorgan International Equity R5 | |||
| AIWEX | 17.46 | -0.06 | -0.34% |
| Cavanal Hill World Energy Institutional | |||
| THOIX | 47.53 | -0.32 | -0.67% |
| Thornburg Global Opportunities I | |||
FPFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FPFD has been loosely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FPFD jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FPFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPFD | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| FITBO - FPFD | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| ACGLN - FPFD | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| ACGLO - FPFD | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| NTRSO - FPFD | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| HBANP - FPFD | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||
HBANP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANP has been closely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBANP jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBANP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBANP | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| FITBO - HBANP | 67% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| TCBIO - HBANP | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| FCNCP - HBANP | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| HBANL - HBANP | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| OZKAP - HBANP | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||