Advertisement
FPE vs HBANP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPE is a Buy and HBANP is a Hold.
HBANP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FPE | HBANP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 40% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 56% | 18 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RIGS | 23.28 | 0.25 | +1.09% |
| RiverFront Strategic Income ETF | |||
| DRIV | 30.31 | 0.08 | +0.28% |
| Global X Atnms & Elctrc Vhcls ETF | |||
| FPEI | 19.41 | 0.05 | +0.26% |
| First Trust Instl Pref Secs and Inc ETF | |||
| ILOW | 42.74 | -0.04 | -0.09% |
| AB Active ETFs Inc. | |||
| EMTY | 11.98 | -0.25 | -2.06% |
| ProShares Decline of the Retl Store ETF | |||
FPE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FPE has been loosely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FPE jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FPE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPE | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| HBANP - FPE | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| WAFDP - FPE | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| TCBIO - FPE | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| FITBP - FPE | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| TBB - FPE | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
More | ||||
HBANP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANP has been closely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBANP jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBANP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBANP | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| FITBO - HBANP | 67% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| HBANL - HBANP | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| FCNCP - HBANP | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| FCNCO - HBANP | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| OZKAP - HBANP | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
More | ||||