Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$43.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$22.99
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.87M
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. WSBFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Hold and WSBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. WSBFX (150M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPCSX (1.86) vs WSBFX (1.21). FPCSX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPCSX (5 years) vs WSBFX (27 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.95). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. WSBFX (3.30). WSBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: WSBFX (100000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.09 vs. WSBFX (1.64). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.60 vs. WSBFX (10.47).
| FPCSX | WSBFX | FPCSX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.95 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.95 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.920 | 3.142 | 252% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 100000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 150M | 7,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.21 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.09 | 1.64 | 434% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.67 | 12.30 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.60 | 10.47 | 264% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers