Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$45.27
Change+$0.09 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$23.91
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.5M
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. WSBFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Hold and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. WSBFX (153M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPCSX (1.89) vs WSBFX (1.25). FPCSX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPCSX (5 years) vs WSBFX (26 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.95). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. WSBFX (3.30). WSBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: WSBFX (100000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.47 vs. WSBFX (2.76). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 47.41 vs. WSBFX (17.29).
| FPCSX | WSBFX | FPCSX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.95 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.95 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.777 | 7.316 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 100000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 153M | 7,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.25 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.47 | 2.76 | 307% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.47 | 18.56 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.41 | 17.29 | 274% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement