Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs TGIPX
FPCSX vs TGIPX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs TGIPX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$44.39
Change-$0.83 (-1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.29B
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Mod Gr Allc I
Price$43.92
Change-$0.49 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.03B
FPCSX vs TGIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. TGIPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Hold and TGIPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. TGIPX (4.03B). FPCSX pays higher dividends than TGIPX: FPCSX (2.49) vs TGIPX (1.78). FPCSX was incepted earlier than TGIPX: FPCSX (5 years) vs TGIPX (10 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than TGIPX (0.77). TGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.60 vs. FPCSX (10.00). TGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: TGIPX (500000) vs FPCSX (100000000). TGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.56 vs. FPCSX (10.69). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 26.63 vs. TGIPX (12.52).
| FPCSX | TGIPX | FPCSX / TGIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.63 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.77 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.874 | 3.171 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 500000 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3B | 4.03B | 305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 1.78 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.69 | 12.56 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.30 | 36.71 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.63 | 12.52 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement