Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs NDMSX
FPCSX vs NDMSX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs NDMSX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$43.32
Change+$0.09 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv Svc
Price$9.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets917.22M
FPCSX vs NDMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. NDMSX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Hold and NDMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. NDMSX (917M). NDMSX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: NDMSX (2.32) vs FPCSX (1.86). FPCSX was incepted earlier than NDMSX: FPCSX (5 years) vs NDMSX (26 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than NDMSX (0.90). NDMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (10.00). NDMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: NDMSX (50000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.09 vs. NDMSX (5.70). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.60 vs. NDMSX (7.96).
| FPCSX | NDMSX | FPCSX / NDMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.90 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.90 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.920 | 7.225 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 50000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 917M | 1,298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.32 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.09 | 5.70 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.67 | 19.49 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.60 | 7.96 | 347% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement