Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$43.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$9.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets915.8M
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. GMIAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Hold and GMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. GMIAX (916M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: GMIAX (2.58) vs FPCSX (1.86). FPCSX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPCSX (5 years) vs GMIAX (21 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (10.00). GMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: GMIAX (1000000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. GMIAX (6.00). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.60 vs. GMIAX (9.93).
| FPCSX | GMIAX | FPCSX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.50 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.50 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.920 | 7.521 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 916M | 1,299% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.58 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 6.00 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.76 | 21.17 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.60 | 9.93 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.39 | - |