Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$45.27
Change+$0.09 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$10.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets913.07M
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. GMIAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Hold and GMIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. GMIAX (913M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: GMIAX (2.62) vs FPCSX (1.89). FPCSX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPCSX (5 years) vs GMIAX (21 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (10.00). GMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: GMIAX (1000000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.47 vs. GMIAX (-1.52). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 47.41 vs. GMIAX (26.28).
| FPCSX | GMIAX | FPCSX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.50 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.50 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.777 | 12.853 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 913M | 1,281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 2.62 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.47 | -1.52 | -556% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.47 | 29.83 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.41 | 26.28 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers