Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs GMARX
FPCSX vs GMARX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs GMARX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$43.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R
Price$9.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets915.8M
FPCSX vs GMARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. GMARX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Hold and GMARX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. GMARX (916M). GMARX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: GMARX (2.30) vs FPCSX (1.86). FPCSX was incepted earlier than GMARX: FPCSX (5 years) vs GMARX (22 years). GMARX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FPCSX (1.02). GMARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (10.00). GMARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: GMARX (0) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. GMARX (4.87). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.60 vs. GMARX (5.15).
| FPCSX | GMARX | FPCSX / GMARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.14 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.14 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.920 | 6.468 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 916M | 1,299% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.30 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 4.87 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.76 | 17.31 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.60 | 5.15 | 536% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement