Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MPACX
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MPACX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$41.21
Change-$0.05 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets959.06M
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
Price$27.59
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.93M
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MPACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MPACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 959M vs. MPACX (220M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MPACX: FPBFX (4.41) vs MPACX (1.91). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MPACX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MPACX (22 years). MPACX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPACX: FPBFX (0) vs MPACX (2500). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.93 vs. MPACX (16.71). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.08 vs. MPACX (-15.06).
| FPBFX | MPACX | FPBFX / MPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.805 | 23.225 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 959M | 220M | 436% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.41 | 1.91 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.93 | 16.71 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.74 | 47.85 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.08 | -15.06 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.44 | 44.59 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers