Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MPACX
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MPACX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$41.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets960.58M
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
Price$28.77
Change-$0.07 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.65M
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MPACX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MPACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 961M vs. MPACX (208M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MPACX: FPBFX (4.37) vs MPACX (0.00). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MPACX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MPACX (22 years). MPACX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPACX: FPBFX (0) vs MPACX (2500). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.41 vs. MPACX (32.64). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.09 vs. MPACX (-28.59).
| FPBFX | MPACX | FPBFX / MPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.066 | 6.556 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 961M | 208M | 462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.41 | 32.64 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.16 | 32.85 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.09 | -28.59 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.65 | 59.15 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers