Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MPACX
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MPACX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$42.63
Change+$0.74 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
Price$29.24
Change+$0.95 (+3.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets221.31M
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MPACX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MPACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. MPACX (221M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MPACX: FPBFX (4.02) vs MPACX (0.00). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MPACX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MPACX (22 years). MPACX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.98). MPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (47.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPACX: FPBFX (0) vs MPACX (2500). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.78 vs. MPACX (30.54). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.57 vs. MPACX (-30.93).
| FPBFX | MPACX | FPBFX / MPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.25 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.25 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.551 | 8.296 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 221M | 485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.78 | 30.54 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.16 | 32.96 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.57 | -30.93 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.00 | 58.30 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement