Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIPIX
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIPIX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$41.59
Change-$0.92 (-2.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets994.35M
Matthews Asia Dividend Instl
Price$17.33
Change-$0.15 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.25M
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIPIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MIPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 994M vs. MIPIX (569M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIPIX: FPBFX (4.30) vs MIPIX (2.77). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIPIX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIPIX (15 years). MIPIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). FPBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MIPIX (16.81). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPIX: FPBFX (0) vs MIPIX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.24 vs. MIPIX (22.85). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.58 vs. MIPIX (-12.22).
| FPBFX | MIPIX | FPBFX / MIPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.058 | 24.793 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 994M | 569M | 175% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.30 | 2.77 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.24 | 22.85 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.53 | 43.68 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.58 | -12.22 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.76 | 32.23 | 229% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers