Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIPIX
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIPIX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$38.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets954.06M
Matthews Asia Dividend Instl
Price$17.33
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets540.2M
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIPIX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MIPIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 954M vs. MIPIX (540M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIPIX: FPBFX (4.49) vs MIPIX (2.75). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIPIX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIPIX (15 years). MIPIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). FPBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MIPIX (16.81). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPIX: FPBFX (0) vs MIPIX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.46 vs. MIPIX (23.22). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.57 vs. MIPIX (-15.01).
| FPBFX | MIPIX | FPBFX / MIPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.020 | 24.793 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 954M | 540M | 177% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.49 | 2.75 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.46 | 23.22 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.70 | 40.00 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.57 | -15.01 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.65 | 35.37 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement