Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIPIX
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIPIX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$41.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets960.58M
Matthews Asia Dividend Instl
Price$18.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets542.61M
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIPIX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MIPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 961M vs. MIPIX (543M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIPIX: FPBFX (4.37) vs MIPIX (2.72). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIPIX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIPIX (15 years). MIPIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). FPBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MIPIX (16.81). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPIX: FPBFX (0) vs MIPIX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.41 vs. MIPIX (36.79). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.09 vs. MIPIX (-14.73).
| FPBFX | MIPIX | FPBFX / MIPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.066 | 4.606 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 961M | 543M | 177% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.37 | 2.72 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.41 | 36.79 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.16 | 37.73 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.09 | -14.73 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.65 | 55.78 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers