Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIAPX
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIAPX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$38.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets954.06M
Matthews Asia Growth Instl
Price$27.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.29M
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIAPX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MIAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 954M vs. MIAPX (207M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIAPX: FPBFX (4.49) vs MIAPX (2.05). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIAPX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIAPX (15 years). MIAPX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MIAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIAPX: FPBFX (0) vs MIAPX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.20 vs. MIAPX (17.60). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.77 vs. MIAPX (-26.68).
| FPBFX | MIAPX | FPBFX / MIAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.758 | 19.621 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 954M | 207M | 461% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.49 | 2.05 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.20 | 17.60 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.39 | 35.11 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.77 | -26.68 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.32 | 38.42 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement