Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIAPX
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIAPX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$42.63
Change+$0.74 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
Matthews Asia Growth Instl
Price$29.65
Change+$0.96 (+3.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets222.17M
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIAPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MIAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. MIAPX (222M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIAPX: FPBFX (4.02) vs MIAPX (0.00). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIAPX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIAPX (15 years). MIAPX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.98). MIAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (47.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIAPX: FPBFX (0) vs MIAPX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.78 vs. MIAPX (30.67). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.57 vs. MIAPX (-30.40).
| FPBFX | MIAPX | FPBFX / MIAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.12 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.12 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.551 | 8.291 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 222M | 482% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.78 | 30.67 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.16 | 33.41 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.57 | -30.40 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.00 | 61.06 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement