Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MAPIX
FPBFX vs MAPIX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MAPIX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$41.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets960.58M
Matthews Asia Dividend Investor
Price$18.19
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets542.61M
FPBFX vs MAPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MAPIX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MAPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 961M vs. MAPIX (543M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MAPIX: FPBFX (4.37) vs MAPIX (2.62). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MAPIX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MAPIX (19 years). MAPIX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). FPBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MAPIX (16.81). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAPIX: FPBFX (0) vs MAPIX (2500). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.41 vs. MAPIX (36.58). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.09 vs. MAPIX (-15.15).
| FPBFX | MAPIX | FPBFX / MAPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.20 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.20 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.066 | 4.600 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 961M | 543M | 177% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.37 | 2.62 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.41 | 36.58 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.16 | 37.37 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.09 | -15.15 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.65 | 54.20 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement