FPAFY
Price
$4.14
Change
-$0.08 (-1.90%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.52B
GPAGF
Price
$20.62
Change
+$3.21 (+18.44%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
6.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FPAFY vs GPAGF

Header iconFPAFY vs GPAGF Comparison
Open Charts FPAFY vs GPAGFBanner chart's image
First Pacific
Price$4.14
Change-$0.08 (-1.90%)
Volume$47.88K
Capitalization3.52B
Gruma S.A.B. de CV
Price$20.62
Change+$3.21 (+18.44%)
Volume$1.53K
Capitalization6.42B
FPAFY vs GPAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPAFY vs. GPAGF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPAFY is a Hold and GPAGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FPAFY: $4.14 vs. GPAGF: $20.62)
Brand notoriety: FPAFY and GPAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPAFY: 144% vs. GPAGF: 199%
Market capitalization -- FPAFY: $3.52B vs. GPAGF: $6.42B
FPAFY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $3.52B. GPAGF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $6.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $231.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPAFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGPAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FPAFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GPAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPAGF is a better buy in the long-term than FPAFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPAFY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPAGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FPAFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GPAGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPAGF is a better buy in the short-term than FPAFY.

Price Growth

FPAFY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -3.72% price change this week, while GPAGF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +18.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +187.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.36% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPAGF($6.42B) has a higher market cap than FPAFY($3.52B). GPAGF has higher P/E ratio than FPAFY: GPAGF (13.66) vs FPAFY (4.93). FPAFY YTD gains are higher at: 56.367 vs. GPAGF (28.875). FPAFY has more cash in the bank: 2.86B vs. GPAGF (362M). GPAGF has less debt than FPAFY: GPAGF (1.84B) vs FPAFY (12.6B).
FPAFYGPAGFFPAFY / GPAGF
Capitalization3.52B6.42B55%
EBITDAN/A1.08B-
Gain YTD56.36728.875195%
P/E Ratio4.9313.6636%
RevenueN/A6.33B-
Total Cash2.86B362M789%
Total Debt12.6B1.84B686%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPAFY vs GPAGF: Fundamental Ratings
FPAFY
GPAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7449
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
337
SMR RATING
1..100
9734
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5741
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
285

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPAFY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPAGF (59). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPAGF (37). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPAFY (97). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPAFY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as GPAGF (44). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to GPAGF’s over the last 12 months.

GPAGF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFY (57). This means that GPAGF’s stock grew similarly to FPAFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPAFYGPAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PUI46.020.33
+0.72%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Utilities Momt ETF
FIGB43.690.15
+0.33%
Fidelity Investment Grade Bd ETF
PBOC28.53N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Oct
BCLO50.06-0.01
-0.02%
iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF
BUFQ34.70-0.08
-0.23%
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF

FPAFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFY and GLAPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFY and GLAPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAFY
1D Price
Change %
FPAFY100%
-1.90%
GLAPF - FPAFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPAGF - FPAFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVNZF - FPAFY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - FPAFY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
CLBEY - FPAFY
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.67%
More

GPAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPAGF has been loosely correlated with FAMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPAGF jumps, then FAMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPAGF
1D Price
Change %
GPAGF100%
N/A
FAMI - GPAGF
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.00%
HLNFF - GPAGF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRBMF - GPAGF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - GPAGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
GUZOF - GPAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More