FPAFY
Price
$4.35
Change
+$0.05 (+1.16%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.6B
GLAPF
Price
$17.21
Change
-$0.15 (-0.86%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FPAFY vs GLAPF

Header iconFPAFY vs GLAPF Comparison
Open Charts FPAFY vs GLAPFBanner chart's image
First Pacific
Price$4.35
Change+$0.05 (+1.16%)
Volume$14.12K
Capitalization3.6B
Glanbia
Price$17.21
Change-$0.15 (-0.86%)
Volume$5.12K
Capitalization4.24B
FPAFY vs GLAPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPAFY vs. GLAPF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPAFY is a StrongBuy and GLAPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FPAFY: $4.35 vs. GLAPF: $17.22)
Brand notoriety: FPAFY and GLAPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPAFY: 45% vs. GLAPF: 1320%
Market capitalization -- FPAFY: $3.6B vs. GLAPF: $4.18B
FPAFY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $3.6B. GLAPF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $4.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $242.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPAFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLAPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FPAFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLAPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPAFY is a better buy in the long-term than GLAPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPAFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLAPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FPAFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLAPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLAPF is a better buy in the short-term than FPAFY.

Price Growth

FPAFY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +2.59% price change this week, while GLAPF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +2.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.61% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLAPF($4.24B) has a higher market cap than FPAFY($3.6B). GLAPF has higher P/E ratio than FPAFY: GLAPF (36.63) vs FPAFY (5.11). FPAFY YTD gains are higher at: 61.205 vs. GLAPF (23.938). FPAFY has more cash in the bank: 2.86B vs. GLAPF (276M). GLAPF has less debt than FPAFY: GLAPF (1.04B) vs FPAFY (12.6B).
FPAFYGLAPFFPAFY / GLAPF
Capitalization3.6B4.24B85%
EBITDAN/A399M-
Gain YTD61.20523.938256%
P/E Ratio5.1136.6314%
RevenueN/A3.95B-
Total Cash2.86B276M1,035%
Total Debt12.6B1.04B1,215%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPAFY vs GLAPF: Fundamental Ratings
FPAFY
GLAPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1988
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
262
SMR RATING
1..100
9789
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
498
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPAFY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAPF (43). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to GLAPF’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLAPF (62). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLAPF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFY (97). This means that GLAPF’s stock grew similarly to FPAFY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAPF (41). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to GLAPF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPAFY (49). This means that GLAPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPAFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPAFYGLAPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGHT10.280.17
+1.70%
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
DSPY55.570.47
+0.85%
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF
SDOG60.310.40
+0.67%
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
SPTE31.750.19
+0.59%
SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF
PMM5.860.02
+0.26%
Putnam Managed Municipal Income

FPAFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFY and GLAPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFY and GLAPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAFY
1D Price
Change %
FPAFY100%
+1.16%
GLAPF - FPAFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPAGF - FPAFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVNZF - FPAFY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - FPAFY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLBEY - FPAFY
5%
Poorly correlated
+6.28%
More

GLAPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLAPF and UVRBF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLAPF and UVRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAPF
1D Price
Change %
GLAPF100%
N/A
UVRBF - GLAPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - GLAPF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
GRBMF - GLAPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNFF - GLAPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPY - GLAPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More