FPAFY
Price
$3.58
Change
-$0.11 (-2.98%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
GLAPF
Price
$14.58
Change
+$0.08 (+0.55%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FPAFY vs GLAPF

Header iconFPAFY vs GLAPF Comparison
Open Charts FPAFY vs GLAPFBanner chart's image
First Pacific
Price$3.58
Change-$0.11 (-2.98%)
Volume$36.7K
Capitalization1.53B
Glanbia
Price$14.58
Change+$0.08 (+0.55%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.15B
FPAFY vs GLAPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPAFY vs. GLAPF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPAFY is a StrongBuy and GLAPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FPAFY: $3.58 vs. GLAPF: $14.58)
Brand notoriety: FPAFY and GLAPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPAFY: 100% vs. GLAPF: 4%
Market capitalization -- FPAFY: $1.53B vs. GLAPF: $4.15B
FPAFY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $1.53B. GLAPF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $4.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPAFY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLAPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FPAFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GLAPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPAFY is a better buy in the long-term than GLAPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPAFY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLAPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FPAFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GLAPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FPAFY and GLAPF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FPAFY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while GLAPF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLAPF($4.15B) has a higher market cap than FPAFY($1.53B). GLAPF has higher P/E ratio than FPAFY: GLAPF (18.98) vs FPAFY (3.93). FPAFY YTD gains are higher at: 29.513 vs. GLAPF (5.000). FPAFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.33B vs. GLAPF (387M). FPAFY has more cash in the bank: 2.09B vs. GLAPF (439M). GLAPF has less debt than FPAFY: GLAPF (1.01B) vs FPAFY (11.3B). FPAFY has higher revenues than GLAPF: FPAFY (10.3B) vs GLAPF (5.64B).
FPAFYGLAPFFPAFY / GLAPF
Capitalization1.53B4.15B37%
EBITDA2.33B387M601%
Gain YTD29.5135.000590%
P/E Ratio3.9318.9821%
Revenue10.3B5.64B183%
Total Cash2.09B439M476%
Total Debt11.3B1.01B1,115%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPAFY vs GLAPF: Fundamental Ratings
FPAFY
GLAPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
360
SMR RATING
1..100
9887
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2415
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPAFY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAPF (40). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to GLAPF’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLAPF (60). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLAPF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFY (98). This means that GLAPF’s stock grew similarly to FPAFY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAPF (44). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to GLAPF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFY (24). This means that GLAPF’s stock grew similarly to FPAFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPAFYGLAPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIEJX39.520.53
+1.36%
MFS International Equity A
OIIEX15.000.12
+0.81%
Optimum International Instl
CAXCX18.420.03
+0.16%
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity C
FVDKX37.88N/A
N/A
Fidelity Value Discovery K
MSSGX16.18N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Inception I

FPAFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFY and GLAPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFY and GLAPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAFY
1D Price
Change %
FPAFY100%
-2.98%
GLAPF - FPAFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPAGF - FPAFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVNZF - FPAFY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - FPAFY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLBEY - FPAFY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GLAPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLAPF and UVRBF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLAPF and UVRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAPF
1D Price
Change %
GLAPF100%
N/A
UVRBF - GLAPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - GLAPF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
GRBMF - GLAPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNFF - GLAPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCHOY - GLAPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More