Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPADX vs RNWBX
FPADX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FPADX vs RNWBX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Idx
Price$13.99
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.76B
American Funds New World R2
Price$93.52
Change+$0.42 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.28B
FPADX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPADX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPADX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 76.3B vs. FPADX (11.8B). FPADX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FPADX (2.02) vs RNWBX (0.12). FPADX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FPADX (14 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FPADX (0.07). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FPADX (5.00). FPADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FPADX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FPADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.53 vs. RNWBX (20.32). FPADX return over 5 years is better than : 31.03 vs. RNWBX (21.37).
| FPADX | RNWBX | FPADX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 1.67 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 1.67 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.652 | 27.152 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 76.3B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.12 | 1,726% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.53 | 20.32 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.35 | 47.10 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.03 | 21.37 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.73 | 93.86 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers