Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs WSBFX
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs WSBFX
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$23.91
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.5M
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. WSBFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. WSBFX (153M). FPACX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPACX (1.90) vs WSBFX (1.25). FPACX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPACX (32 years) vs WSBFX (26 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.95). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. WSBFX (3.30). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: FPACX (1500) vs WSBFX (100000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.40 vs. WSBFX (2.76). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.99 vs. WSBFX (17.29).
| FPACX | WSBFX | FPACX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.95 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.95 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.753 | 7.316 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 153M | 7,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.25 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.40 | 2.76 | 305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.24 | 18.56 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.99 | 17.29 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.58 | 65.40 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement