Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs WSBFX
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs WSBFX
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$22.99
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.87M
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. WSBFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and WSBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. WSBFX (150M). FPACX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPACX (1.87) vs WSBFX (1.21). FPACX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPACX (33 years) vs WSBFX (27 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.95). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. WSBFX (3.30). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: FPACX (1500) vs WSBFX (100000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. WSBFX (1.64). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.27 vs. WSBFX (10.47).
| FPACX | WSBFX | FPACX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.95 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.95 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.890 | 3.142 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 150M | 7,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.21 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 1.64 | 430% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.45 | 12.30 | 280% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.27 | 10.47 | 260% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.86 | 66.64 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement