Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs NDMSX
FPACX vs NDMSX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs NDMSX
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv Svc
Price$9.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets917.22M
FPACX vs NDMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. NDMSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and NDMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. NDMSX (917M). NDMSX pays higher dividends than FPACX: NDMSX (2.32) vs FPACX (1.87). FPACX was incepted earlier than NDMSX: FPACX (33 years) vs NDMSX (26 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NDMSX (0.90). NDMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPACX (10.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDMSX: FPACX (1500) vs NDMSX (50000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. NDMSX (5.70). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.27 vs. NDMSX (7.96).
| FPACX | NDMSX | FPACX / NDMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.90 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.90 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.890 | 7.225 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 50000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 917M | 1,298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 2.32 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 5.70 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.45 | 19.49 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.27 | 7.96 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.86 | 19.42 | 246% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement