Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs GMIAX
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs GMIAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$9.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets915.8M
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. GMIAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and GMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. GMIAX (916M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPACX: GMIAX (2.58) vs FPACX (1.87). FPACX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPACX (33 years) vs GMIAX (21 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPACX (10.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMIAX: FPACX (1500) vs GMIAX (1000000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.99 vs. GMIAX (6.00). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.27 vs. GMIAX (9.93).
| FPACX | GMIAX | FPACX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.50 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.50 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.890 | 7.521 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 916M | 1,299% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 2.58 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.99 | 6.00 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.53 | 21.17 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.27 | 9.93 | 275% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.30 | 22.39 | 211% |