Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs GMIAX
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs GMIAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$9.91
Change-$0.28 (-2.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets930.73M
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. GMIAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Buy and GMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. GMIAX (931M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPACX: GMIAX (4.23) vs FPACX (2.45). FPACX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPACX (33 years) vs GMIAX (21 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.63 vs. FPACX (10.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMIAX: FPACX (1500) vs GMIAX (1000000). GMIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.68 vs. FPACX (10.61). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 26.27 vs. GMIAX (11.88).
| FPACX | GMIAX | FPACX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.50 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.50 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.854 | 3.122 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3B | 931M | 1,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 4.23 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.61 | 11.68 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.06 | 19.19 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.27 | 11.88 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.40 | 41.00 | 164% |