Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs GMIAX
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs GMIAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$10.27
Change-$0.11 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets925.96M
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. GMIAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Buy and GMIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.2B vs. GMIAX (926M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPACX: GMIAX (2.59) vs FPACX (1.89). FPACX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPACX (32 years) vs GMIAX (21 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPACX (10.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMIAX: FPACX (1500) vs GMIAX (1000000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.65 vs. GMIAX (-0.42). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. GMIAX (24.28).
| FPACX | GMIAX | FPACX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.50 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.50 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.474 | 15.297 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 926M | 1,317% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 2.59 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.65 | -0.42 | -2,045% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.67 | 23.72 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 24.28 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.97 | 23.30 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement