FOVSY
Price
$12.30
Change
+$1.30 (+11.82%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.02B
MBGAF
Price
$60.68
Change
+$1.34 (+2.26%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
58.59B
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOVSY vs MBGAF

Header iconFOVSY vs MBGAF Comparison
Open Charts FOVSY vs MBGAFBanner chart's image
Ford Otomotiv Sanayi AS
Price$12.30
Change+$1.30 (+11.82%)
Volume$318
Capitalization9.02B
Mercedes Benz Group AG
Price$60.68
Change+$1.34 (+2.26%)
Volume$32.71K
Capitalization58.59B
FOVSY vs MBGAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FOVSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOVSY vs. MBGAF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOVSY is a Buy and MBGAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FOVSY: $12.30 vs. MBGAF: $60.68)
Brand notoriety: FOVSY and MBGAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOVSY: 130% vs. MBGAF: 111%
Market capitalization -- FOVSY: $9.02B vs. MBGAF: $58.59B
FOVSY [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $9.02B. MBGAF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $58.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.06T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $34.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOVSY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMBGAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FOVSY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MBGAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOVSY is a better buy in the long-term than MBGAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOVSY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBGAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOVSY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MBGAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOVSY is a better buy in the short-term than MBGAF.

Price Growth

FOVSY (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +11.82% price change this week, while MBGAF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +6.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBGAF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+1.45% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBGAF($58.6B) has a higher market cap than FOVSY($9.02B). FOVSY has higher P/E ratio than MBGAF: FOVSY (11.45) vs MBGAF (7.36). MBGAF YTD gains are higher at: 9.788 vs. FOVSY (-0.570). FOVSY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 55.5B vs. MBGAF (17.4B). FOVSY has more cash in the bank: 57B vs. MBGAF (26.9B). MBGAF has less debt than FOVSY: MBGAF (86.4B) vs FOVSY (148B). FOVSY has higher revenues than MBGAF: FOVSY (634B) vs MBGAF (139B).
FOVSYMBGAFFOVSY / MBGAF
Capitalization9.02B58.6B15%
EBITDA55.5B17.4B319%
Gain YTD-0.5709.788-6%
P/E Ratio11.457.36156%
Revenue634B139B456%
Total Cash57B26.9B212%
Total Debt148B86.4B171%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOVSY vs MBGAF: Fundamental Ratings
FOVSY
MBGAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1053
SMR RATING
1..100
3678
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1615
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOVSY's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MBGAF (35). This means that FOVSY’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

FOVSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBGAF (53). This means that FOVSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

FOVSY's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBGAF (78). This means that FOVSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

FOVSY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MBGAF (55). This means that FOVSY’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

MBGAF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as FOVSY (16). This means that MBGAF’s stock grew similarly to FOVSY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOVSYMBGAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOVSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFUV42.520.31
+0.73%
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
XIDV32.020.23
+0.73%
Franklin Intl Div Mltplr Idx ETF
ALTY11.690.02
+0.20%
Global X Alternative Income ETF
XTRE49.60-0.06
-0.13%
BondBloxx Bloomberg ThreeYrTrgDurUSTrETF
DGCB54.56-0.17
-0.32%
Dimensional Global Credit ETF

FOVSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOVSY has been loosely correlated with ECDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOVSY jumps, then ECDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOVSY
1D Price
Change %
FOVSY100%
N/A
ECDA - FOVSY
40%
Loosely correlated
+4.56%
DNFGF - FOVSY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBGAF - FOVSY
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
MBGYY - FOVSY
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
BYDDF - FOVSY
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
More

MBGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBGAF has been closely correlated with MBGYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBGAF jumps, then MBGYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBGAF
1D Price
Change %
MBGAF100%
+2.25%
MBGYY - MBGAF
96%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
VWAPY - MBGAF
71%
Closely correlated
+2.22%
VWAGY - MBGAF
70%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
POAHY - MBGAF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
DRPRY - MBGAF
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
More