FOSL
Price
$3.75
Change
+$0.33 (+9.65%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
211.45M
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WWW
Price
$17.46
Change
+$0.89 (+5.37%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.43B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOSL vs WWW

Header iconFOSL vs WWW Comparison
Open Charts FOSL vs WWWBanner chart's image
Fossil Group
Price$3.75
Change+$0.33 (+9.65%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization211.45M
Wolverine World Wide
Price$17.46
Change+$0.89 (+5.37%)
Volume$2.03M
Capitalization1.43B
FOSL vs WWW Comparison Chart in %
FOSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WWW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOSL vs. WWW commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSL is a StrongBuy and WWW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FOSL: $3.41 vs. WWW: $16.57)
Brand notoriety: FOSL and WWW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOSL: 58% vs. WWW: 19%
Market capitalization -- FOSL: $211.45M vs. WWW: $1.43B
FOSL [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $211.45M. WWW’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $1.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $97.04B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOSL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FOSL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WWW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WWW is a better buy in the long-term than FOSL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOSL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WWW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WWW is a better buy in the short-term than FOSL.

Price Growth

FOSL (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а +15.59% price change this week, while WWW (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +3.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +2.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOSL is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2026.

WWW is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (+2.83% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WWW($1.43B) has a higher market cap than FOSL($211M). FOSL YTD gains are higher at: 104.192 vs. WWW (-23.782). WWW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 165M vs. FOSL (-28.76M). FOSL has less debt than WWW: FOSL (324M) vs WWW (860M). WWW has higher revenues than FOSL: WWW (1.82B) vs FOSL (1.08B).
FOSLWWWFOSL / WWW
Capitalization211M1.43B15%
EBITDA-28.76M165M-17%
Gain YTD104.192-23.782-438%
P/E RatioN/A16.32-
Revenue1.08B1.82B60%
Total Cash110MN/A-
Total Debt324M860M38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOSL vs WWW: Fundamental Ratings
FOSL
WWW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9634
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3690
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10090
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WWW's Valuation (20) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOSL (87) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that WWW’s stock grew significantly faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

WWW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that WWW’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

WWW's SMR Rating (34) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOSL (96) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that WWW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

FOSL's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWW (90) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that FOSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWW’s over the last 12 months.

WWW's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that WWW’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOSLWWW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WWW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KMDHF19.19N/A
N/A
KOMEDA HLDGS CO LTD.
BLNC1.55N/A
N/A
Balance Labs, Inc.
ORMNF0.16N/A
N/A
Orex Minerals Inc
RPYTF144.00N/A
N/A
Reply SPA
AVIKF8.21N/A
N/A
Advanced Info Service Public Co., Ltd.

FOSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOSL has been loosely correlated with MOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOSL jumps, then MOV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOSL
1D Price
Change %
FOSL100%
+8.95%
MOV - FOSL
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
DBI - FOSL
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
SIG - FOSL
31%
Poorly correlated
-6.82%
SHOO - FOSL
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.84%
WWW - FOSL
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More

WWW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWW has been loosely correlated with RL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WWW jumps, then RL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWW
1D Price
Change %
WWW100%
-2.64%
RL - WWW
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
UA - WWW
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
UAA - WWW
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
SHOO - WWW
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.84%
HBI - WWW
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More