Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSBX vs NAESX
FOSBX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FOSBX vs NAESX
Tributary Small Company Instl Plus
Price$30.00
Change+$0.23 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets623.09M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.10
Change+$1.17 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
FOSBX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSBX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSBX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FOSBX (623M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FOSBX: NAESX (1.20) vs FOSBX (0.26). FOSBX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FOSBX (15 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FOSBX (1.05) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FOSBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOSBX: NAESX (3000) vs FOSBX (5000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. FOSBX (-8.97). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.48 vs. FOSBX (34.89).
| FOSBX | NAESX | FOSBX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.17 | 559% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.17 | 618% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.121 | 6.199 | -34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 3000 | 166,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 623M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.20 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.97 | 8.00 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.83 | 50.66 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.89 | 71.48 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.56 | 148.14 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement