Advertisement
FORR vs PHLT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORR is a StrongBuy and PHLT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FORR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHLT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FORR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PHLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FORR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHLT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FORR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PHLT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FORR (@Data Processing Services) experienced а -8.61% price change this week, while PHLT (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -0.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
FORR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
PHLT is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Data Processing Services (-0.97% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
@Services to the Health Industry (+2.00% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| FORR | PHLT | FORR / PHLT | |
| Capitalization | 190M | 602M | 32% |
| EBITDA | -47.93M | 1.95M | -2,464% |
| Gain YTD | -36.311 | 152.318 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | 187.00 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 422M | 129M | 327% |
| Total Cash | 134M | 9.98M | 1,343% |
| Total Debt | 57M | 8.89M | 641% |
FORR | PHLT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PHLT's Valuation (71) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FORR (82). This means that PHLT’s stock grew similarly to FORR’s over the last 12 months.
PHLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FORR (100). This means that PHLT’s stock grew significantly faster than FORR’s over the last 12 months.
PHLT's SMR Rating (94) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FORR (97). This means that PHLT’s stock grew similarly to FORR’s over the last 12 months.
PHLT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FORR (81). This means that PHLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FORR’s over the last 12 months.
FORR's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as PHLT (83). This means that FORR’s stock grew similarly to PHLT’s over the last 12 months.
| FORR | PHLT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 62% | 11 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 13 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 88% |
Advertisement
FORR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORR has been loosely correlated with CASS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FORR jumps, then CASS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORR | 100% | -1.77% | ||
| CASS - FORR | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| DLHC - FORR | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| BCO - FORR | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| ICFI - FORR | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| BRC - FORR | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||
PHLT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHLT has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHLT jumps, then FC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHLT | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| FC - PHLT | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| LINC - PHLT | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| FORR - PHLT | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| ICFI - PHLT | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.79% | ||
| PRSU - PHLT | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||