FORR
Price
$9.85
Change
-$0.13 (-1.30%)
Updated
Aug 11, 02:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
190.45M
79 days until earnings call
GRNQ
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.02 (-1.23%)
Updated
Aug 11, 02:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FORR vs GRNQ

Header iconFORR vs GRNQ Comparison
Open Charts FORR vs GRNQBanner chart's image
Forrester Research
Price$9.85
Change-$0.13 (-1.30%)
Volume$100
Capitalization190.45M
Greenpro Capital
Price$1.60
Change-$0.02 (-1.23%)
Volume$100
Capitalization12.42M
FORR vs GRNQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FORR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FORR vs. GRNQ commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORR is a StrongBuy and GRNQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FORR: $9.98 vs. GRNQ: $1.63)
Brand notoriety: FORR and GRNQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Data Processing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FORR: 61% vs. GRNQ: 0%
Market capitalization -- FORR: $190.45M vs. GRNQ: $12.42M
FORR [@Data Processing Services] is valued at $190.45M. GRNQ’s [@Data Processing Services] market capitalization is $12.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $46.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $6.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FORR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRNQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FORR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRNQ is a better buy in the long-term than FORR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FORR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRNQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FORR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GRNQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRNQ is a better buy in the short-term than FORR.

Price Growth

FORR (@Data Processing Services) experienced а -8.61% price change this week, while GRNQ (@Data Processing Services) price change was -3.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

FORR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Data Processing Services (-1.06% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FORR($190M) has a higher market cap than GRNQ($12.4M). FORR has higher P/E ratio than GRNQ: FORR (187.00) vs GRNQ (9.30). GRNQ YTD gains are higher at: 46.396 vs. FORR (-36.311). GRNQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -839.31K vs. FORR (-47.93M). FORR has more cash in the bank: 134M vs. GRNQ (886K). GRNQ has less debt than FORR: GRNQ (105K) vs FORR (57M). FORR has higher revenues than GRNQ: FORR (422M) vs GRNQ (3.19M).
FORRGRNQFORR / GRNQ
Capitalization190M12.4M1,532%
EBITDA-47.93M-839.31K5,711%
Gain YTD-36.31146.396-78%
P/E Ratio187.009.302,011%
Revenue422M3.19M13,225%
Total Cash134M886K15,124%
Total Debt57M105K54,286%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FORR vs GRNQ: Fundamental Ratings
FORR
GRNQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
787
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FORR's Valuation (82) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GRNQ (92) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FORR’s stock grew similarly to GRNQ’s over the last 12 months.

FORR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GRNQ (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FORR’s stock grew similarly to GRNQ’s over the last 12 months.

GRNQ's SMR Rating (96) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FORR (97) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GRNQ’s stock grew similarly to FORR’s over the last 12 months.

GRNQ's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FORR (81) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GRNQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FORR’s over the last 12 months.

GRNQ's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FORR (78) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GRNQ’s stock grew significantly faster than FORR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORRGRNQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FORR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSRM15.190.35
+2.36%
SSR Mining
RMBI14.020.13
+0.94%
Richmond Mutual Bancorporation
WSM199.42-0.18
-0.09%
Williams-Sonoma
VMEO3.89-0.14
-3.59%
Vimeo
BTBD1.99-0.13
-6.13%
BT Brands

FORR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORR has been loosely correlated with CASS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FORR jumps, then CASS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORR
1D Price
Change %
FORR100%
-1.77%
CASS - FORR
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
DLHC - FORR
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
BCO - FORR
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
ICFI - FORR
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
BRC - FORR
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
More

GRNQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRNQ and REZI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRNQ and REZI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRNQ
1D Price
Change %
GRNQ100%
N/A
REZI - GRNQ
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
CASS - GRNQ
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
ADT - GRNQ
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
MMS - GRNQ
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
FORR - GRNQ
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
More