It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FORR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRNQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FORR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRNQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FORR (@Data Processing Services) experienced а -8.61% price change this week, while GRNQ (@Data Processing Services) price change was -3.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.05%.
FORR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
FORR | GRNQ | FORR / GRNQ | |
Capitalization | 190M | 12.4M | 1,532% |
EBITDA | -47.93M | -839.31K | 5,711% |
Gain YTD | -36.311 | 46.396 | -78% |
P/E Ratio | 187.00 | 9.30 | 2,011% |
Revenue | 422M | 3.19M | 13,225% |
Total Cash | 134M | 886K | 15,124% |
Total Debt | 57M | 105K | 54,286% |
FORR | GRNQ | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FORR's Valuation (82) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GRNQ (92) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FORR’s stock grew similarly to GRNQ’s over the last 12 months.
FORR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GRNQ (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FORR’s stock grew similarly to GRNQ’s over the last 12 months.
GRNQ's SMR Rating (96) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FORR (97) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GRNQ’s stock grew similarly to FORR’s over the last 12 months.
GRNQ's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FORR (81) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GRNQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FORR’s over the last 12 months.
GRNQ's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FORR (78) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GRNQ’s stock grew significantly faster than FORR’s over the last 12 months.
FORR | GRNQ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% | 4 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago62% | 11 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 5 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORR has been loosely correlated with CASS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FORR jumps, then CASS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FORR | 100% | -1.77% | ||
CASS - FORR | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
DLHC - FORR | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
BCO - FORR | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
ICFI - FORR | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.79% | ||
BRC - FORR | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GRNQ and REZI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRNQ and REZI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRNQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GRNQ | 100% | N/A | ||
REZI - GRNQ | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.41% | ||
CASS - GRNQ | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
ADT - GRNQ | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
MMS - GRNQ | 24% Poorly correlated | +4.02% | ||
FORR - GRNQ | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
More |