FORM
Price
$34.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.63B
3 days until earnings call
GFS
Price
$39.98
Change
+$0.75 (+1.91%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
22.19B
9 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FORM vs GFS

Header iconFORM vs GFS Comparison
Open Charts FORM vs GFSBanner chart's image
FormFactor
Price$34.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$177
Capitalization2.63B
GlobalFoundries
Price$39.98
Change+$0.75 (+1.91%)
Volume$1.81M
Capitalization22.19B
FORM vs GFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FORM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FORM vs. GFS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORM is a Hold and GFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FORM: $34.24 vs. GFS: $39.98)
Brand notoriety: FORM and GFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FORM: 0% vs. GFS: 119%
Market capitalization -- FORM: $2.63B vs. GFS: $22.19B
FORM [@Semiconductors] is valued at $2.63B. GFS’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $22.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.23T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $62.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FORM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FORM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FORM is a better buy in the long-term than GFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FORM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FORM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FORM is a better buy in the short-term than GFS.

Price Growth

FORM (@Semiconductors) experienced а -2.95% price change this week, while GFS (@Semiconductors) price change was -0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

FORM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-0.33% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFS($22.2B) has a higher market cap than FORM($2.63B). FORM has higher P/E ratio than GFS: FORM (49.41) vs GFS (28.59). GFS YTD gains are higher at: -6.828 vs. FORM (-22.182). GFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.47B vs. FORM (116M). GFS has more cash in the bank: 2.9B vs. FORM (299M). FORM has less debt than GFS: FORM (37.5M) vs GFS (1.63B). GFS has higher revenues than FORM: GFS (6.79B) vs FORM (766M).
FORMGFSFORM / GFS
Capitalization2.63B22.2B12%
EBITDA116M1.47B8%
Gain YTD-22.182-6.828325%
P/E Ratio49.4128.59173%
Revenue766M6.79B11%
Total Cash299M2.9B10%
Total Debt37.5M1.63B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FORM: Fundamental Ratings
FORM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORMGFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FORM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMIZ34.850.27
+0.78%
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
FCTE26.490.16
+0.62%
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF
USDX25.72N/A
N/A
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
GSIE40.29-0.07
-0.17%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF
RINF33.08-0.15
-0.45%
ProShares Inflation Expectations

FORM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORM has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FORM jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORM
1D Price
Change %
FORM100%
N/A
KLIC - FORM
81%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
VECO - FORM
79%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
KLAC - FORM
78%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
ENTG - FORM
77%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
AMKR - FORM
77%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
More

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
+1.91%
KLIC - GFS
73%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
LSCC - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
+2.95%
ON - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
POWI - GFS
71%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
FORM - GFS
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
More