FORL
Price
$11.66
Change
+$0.08 (+0.69%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
73.23M
RRACF
Price
$12.64
Change
+$0.02 (+0.16%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
358.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FORL vs RRACF

Header iconFORL vs RRACF Comparison
Open Charts FORL vs RRACFBanner chart's image
Four Leaf Acquisition
Price$11.66
Change+$0.08 (+0.69%)
Volume$138
Capitalization73.23M
Rigel Resource Acquisition
Price$12.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
Volume$566
Capitalization358.22M
FORL vs RRACF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FORL vs. RRACF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORL is a Hold and RRACF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FORL: $11.66 vs. RRACF: $12.64)
Brand notoriety: FORL and RRACF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FORL: 3% vs. RRACF: 82%
Market capitalization -- FORL: $73.23M vs. RRACF: $358.22M
FORL [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $73.23M. RRACF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $358.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FORL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRRACF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FORL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RRACF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FORL is a better buy in the long-term than RRACF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FORL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRACF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FORL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • RRACF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FORL is a better buy in the short-term than RRACF.

Price Growth

FORL (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.68% price change this week, while RRACF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.67% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRACF($358M) has a higher market cap than FORL($73.2M). RRACF YTD gains are higher at: 9.913 vs. FORL (5.037).
FORLRRACFFORL / RRACF
Capitalization73.2M358M20%
EBITDAN/A-2.45M-
Gain YTD5.0379.91351%
P/E RatioN/A53.19-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A70.7K-
Total DebtN/A5.56M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORLRRACF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
2%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
4%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
3%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QUBSF6.500.20
+3.17%
Qantas Airways Ltd.
CCARF1.00N/A
N/A
Colonial Coal International Corp
MMNNF16.50N/A
N/A
Munters Group AP
EQTL1.00N/A
N/A
Equitech Int'l Corp.
EXCH50.00N/A
N/A
Exchange Bankshares, Inc.

FORL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FORL and IROH have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FORL and IROH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORL
1D Price
Change %
FORL100%
N/A
IROH - FORL
28%
Poorly correlated
-7.87%
RRACF - FORL
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSPO - FORL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
MSSAF - FORL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRLU - FORL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RRACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRACF has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RRACF jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRACF
1D Price
Change %
RRACF100%
N/A
HAIUF - RRACF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KVACU - RRACF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AACIU - RRACF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
ALSUF - RRACF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FORL - RRACF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More