Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FORH vs TMAT
FORH vs TMAT Comparison
Open Charts FORH vs TMAT
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
Price$23.64
Change-$0.11 (-0.46%)
Volume$1.45K
Net Assets176.01M
FORH vs TMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FORH vs. TMAT commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORH is a Hold and TMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMAT has more net assets: 176M vs. FORH (20.6M). TMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than FORH: TMAT (13.983) vs FORH (11.615). FORH was incepted earlier than TMAT: FORH (4 years) vs TMAT (4 years). TMAT (0.85) has a lower expense ratio than FORH (1.19). FORH has a higher turnover TMAT (39.00) vs TMAT (39.00).
| FORH | TMAT | FORH / TMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 11.615 | 13.983 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 20.6M | 176M | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.85 | 140% |
| Turnover | 50.63 | 39.00 | 130% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FORH | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 25 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FORH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORH has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FORH jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORH | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| LAR - FORH | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| GNRC - FORH | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| PAX - FORH | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| LAC - FORH | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| PAGP - FORH | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||
TMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMAT has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMAT jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMAT | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| HOOD - TMAT | 77% Closely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| NVDA - TMAT | 73% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| MU - TMAT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| ARM - TMAT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| MRVL - TMAT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||