Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FORH vs TMAT
FORH vs TMAT Comparison
Open Charts FORH vs TMAT
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
Price$25.65
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Volume$13.58K
Net Assets204.12M
FORH vs TMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FORH vs. TMAT commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORH is a Hold and TMAT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMAT has more net assets: 204M vs. FORH (20.6M). TMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than FORH: TMAT (23.115) vs FORH (19.431). FORH was incepted earlier than TMAT: FORH (5 years) vs TMAT (5 years). TMAT (0.85) has a lower expense ratio than FORH (1.19). FORH has a higher turnover TMAT (39.00) vs TMAT (39.00).
| FORH | TMAT | FORH / TMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 19.431 | 23.115 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 20.6M | 204M | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.85 | 140% |
| Turnover | 60.62 | 39.00 | 155% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FORH | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 76% | 12 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FORH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORH has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FORH jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORH | 100% | N/A | ||
| BHP - FORH | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| LAC - FORH | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| YOU - FORH | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
| DK - FORH | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| GNW - FORH | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||
TMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMAT has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMAT jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMAT | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| HOOD - TMAT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CRDO - TMAT | 74% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| NVDA - TMAT | 73% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CRWD - TMAT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| TSM - TMAT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||