Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FORH vs INFL
FORH vs INFL Comparison
Open Charts FORH vs INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Bnfcrs ETF
Price$42.45
Change+$0.11 (+0.26%)
Volume$77.94K
Net Assets1.27B
FORH vs INFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FORH vs. INFL commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORH is a Hold and INFL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INFL has more net assets: 1.27B vs. FORH (20.6M). INFL has a higher annual dividend yield than FORH: INFL (12.443) vs FORH (11.615). FORH was incepted earlier than INFL: FORH (4 years) vs INFL (4 years). INFL (0.85) has a lower expense ratio than FORH (1.19). FORH has a higher turnover INFL (17.00) vs INFL (17.00).
| FORH | INFL | FORH / INFL | |
| Gain YTD | 11.615 | 12.443 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 20.6M | 1.27B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.85 | 140% |
| Turnover | 50.63 | 17.00 | 298% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 1.75 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FORH | INFL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FORH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORH has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FORH jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORH | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| LAR - FORH | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| GNRC - FORH | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| PAX - FORH | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| LAC - FORH | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| PAGP - FORH | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||
INFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INFL has been loosely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INFL jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFL | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| WPM - INFL | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| FNV - INFL | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| TPL - INFL | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| ICE - INFL | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| BG - INFL | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.62% | ||
More | ||||