Advertisement
FORA vs PRYNF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORA is a Hold and PRYNF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FORA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRYNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FORA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PRYNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FORA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FORA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FORA (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -1.04% price change this week, while PRYNF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
FORA is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.49% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Electronics/Appliances (+0.17% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| FORA | PRYNF | FORA / PRYNF | |
| Capitalization | 59.3M | 1.36M | 4,370% |
| EBITDA | -3.02M | -157.35K | 1,921% |
| Gain YTD | -7.767 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 66.67 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 22.3M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 35.7M | 174K | 20,517% |
| Total Debt | 6.77M | N/A | - |
PRYNF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FORA | PRYNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 16% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 15% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | N/A |
Advertisement
FORA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FORA and PRYNF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FORA and PRYNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORA | 100% | -0.52% | ||
| PRYNF - FORA | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FNCHF - FORA | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TCX - FORA | 27% Poorly correlated | +10.10% | ||
| JTAI - FORA | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| RELY - FORA | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
More | ||||
PRYNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PRYNF and FORA have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRYNF and FORA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRYNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRYNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FORA - PRYNF | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
| LSAK - PRYNF | 29% Poorly correlated | +4.22% | ||
| KPLT - PRYNF | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.71% | ||
| RWWI - PRYNF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
| TAOP - PRYNF | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.81% | ||
More | ||||