FOR
Price
$19.74
Change
-$0.70 (-3.42%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
37 days until earnings call
SDHC
Price
$17.72
Change
-$1.71 (-8.80%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.56B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOR vs SDHC

Header iconFOR vs SDHC Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs SDHCBanner chart's image
Forestar Group
Price$19.74
Change-$0.70 (-3.42%)
Volume$123.96K
Capitalization1.99B
Smith Douglas Homes
Price$17.72
Change-$1.71 (-8.80%)
Volume$175.34K
Capitalization1.56B
FOR vs SDHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SDHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. SDHC commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a Hold and SDHC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FOR: $19.74 vs. SDHC: $17.72)
Brand notoriety: FOR and SDHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 66% vs. SDHC: 266%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. SDHC: $1.56B
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. SDHC’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSDHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SDHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SDHC is a better buy in the long-term than FOR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SDHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SDHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOR is a better buy in the short-term than SDHC.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.08% price change this week, while SDHC (@Real Estate Development) price change was -8.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

SDHC is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.10% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOR($1.99B) has a higher market cap than SDHC($1.56B). FOR YTD gains are higher at: -23.843 vs. SDHC (-30.889).
FORSDHCFOR / SDHC
Capitalization1.99B1.56B128%
EBITDA230MN/A-
Gain YTD-23.843-30.88977%
P/E Ratio10.84N/A-
Revenue1.53BN/A-
Total Cash459MN/A-
Total Debt714MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORSDHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SDHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZDIVX26.26-0.22
-0.83%
Zacks Dividend Investor
RGEBX74.89-0.91
-1.20%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
JSVAX27.30-0.37
-1.34%
Janus Henderson Contrarian T
FDFAX85.34-1.18
-1.36%
Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Port
NSRSX47.08-0.69
-1.44%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6

FOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOR has been loosely correlated with JOE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOR jumps, then JOE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOR
1D Price
Change %
FOR100%
-3.42%
JOE - FOR
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
CWK - FOR
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
HHH - FOR
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
RMR - FOR
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
OPEN - FOR
46%
Loosely correlated
-4.39%
More

SDHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SDHC has been loosely correlated with FOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SDHC jumps, then FOR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SDHC
1D Price
Change %
SDHC100%
-8.80%
FOR - SDHC
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.42%
CWK - SDHC
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
LSEA - SDHC
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
JOE - SDHC
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
HOUS - SDHC
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
More