FOR
Price
$25.12
Change
+$0.12 (+0.48%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
92 days until earnings call
SDHC
Price
$20.51
Change
-$0.31 (-1.49%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.56B
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOR vs SDHC

Header iconFOR vs SDHC Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs SDHCBanner chart's image
Forestar Group
Price$25.12
Change+$0.12 (+0.48%)
Volume$157.02K
Capitalization1.99B
Smith Douglas Homes
Price$20.51
Change-$0.31 (-1.49%)
Volume$69.19K
Capitalization1.56B
FOR vs SDHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SDHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. SDHC commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a Buy and SDHC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FOR: $25.12 vs. SDHC: $20.51)
Brand notoriety: FOR and SDHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 92% vs. SDHC: 81%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. SDHC: $1.56B
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. SDHC’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSDHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SDHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOR is a better buy in the long-term than SDHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SDHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SDHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOR is a better buy in the short-term than SDHC.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +15.02% price change this week, while SDHC (@Real Estate Development) price change was +5.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

SDHC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.21% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOR($1.99B) has a higher market cap than SDHC($1.56B). FOR YTD gains are higher at: -3.086 vs. SDHC (-20.008).
FORSDHCFOR / SDHC
Capitalization1.99B1.56B128%
EBITDA230MN/A-
Gain YTD-3.086-20.00815%
P/E Ratio10.84N/A-
Revenue1.53BN/A-
Total Cash459MN/A-
Total Debt714MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORSDHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SDHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCPRX28.250.22
+0.78%
MFS Mid Cap Growth R2
CRRRX14.400.11
+0.77%
Columbia Small Cap Value II Inst2
TIOTX16.600.04
+0.24%
Nuveen International Opps Retire
PASPX10.94-0.01
-0.09%
PACE Alternative Strategies P
PREAX6.73-0.02
-0.30%
PACE Global Real Estate Securities A

FOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOR has been loosely correlated with JOE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOR jumps, then JOE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOR
1D Price
Change %
FOR100%
+0.48%
JOE - FOR
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
CWK - FOR
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
RMAX - FOR
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
MMI - FOR
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
RMR - FOR
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More

SDHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SDHC has been loosely correlated with FOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SDHC jumps, then FOR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SDHC
1D Price
Change %
SDHC100%
-1.49%
FOR - SDHC
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
CWK - SDHC
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
MMI - SDHC
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
HOUS - SDHC
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
EXPI - SDHC
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
More