Ad is loading...
FOR
Price
Loading...
Change
Loading...
Updated
Loading...
60 days until earnings call
REAX
Price
Loading...
Change
Loading...
Updated
Loading...
110 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FOR vs REAX

Header iconFOR vs REAX Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs REAXBanner chart's image
Forestar Group
PriceLoading...
ChangeLoading...
Volume$105.89K
CapitalizationN/A
Real Brokerage (The)
PriceLoading...
ChangeLoading...
Volume$508.73K
CapitalizationN/A
FOR vs REAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
REAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. REAX commentary
Nov 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a Hold and REAX is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 24, 2024
Stock price -- (FOR: $28.91 vs. REAX: $4.93)
Brand notoriety: FOR and REAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 86% vs. REAX: 77%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. REAX: $572.85M
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. REAX’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $572.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileREAX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • REAX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FOR and REAX are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REAX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • REAX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOR is a better buy in the short-term than REAX.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while REAX (@Real Estate Development) price change was -6.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

REAX is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.07% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOR($1.99B) has a higher market cap than REAX($573M). REAX YTD gains are higher at: 208.125 vs. FOR (-12.579). FOR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 230M vs. REAX (-26.02M). FOR has more cash in the bank: 459M vs. REAX (28.9M). REAX has less debt than FOR: REAX (0) vs FOR (714M). FOR has higher revenues than REAX: FOR (1.53B) vs REAX (689M).
FORREAXFOR / REAX
Capitalization1.99B573M347%
EBITDA230M-26.02M-884%
Gain YTD-12.579208.125-6%
P/E Ratio10.84N/A-
Revenue1.53B689M221%
Total Cash459M28.9M1,588%
Total Debt714M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
69
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORREAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
0%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
REAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME28.450.88
+3.19%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X94339.4900001995.703100
+2.16%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL229.000.72
+0.32%
Apple
SPY590.500.20
+0.03%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA342.03-3.97
-1.15%
Tesla

FOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOR has been loosely correlated with OPEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOR jumps, then OPEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOR
1D Price
Change %
FOR100%
-0.76%
OPEN - FOR
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
LSEA - FOR
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
RDFN - FOR
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
STHO - FOR
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
HHH - FOR
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
More

REAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that REAX and FOR have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that REAX and FOR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REAX
1D Price
Change %
REAX100%
-0.60%
FOR - REAX
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
NYC - REAX
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.89%
RMAX - REAX
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
CWK - REAX
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
TCI - REAX
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
More