FOR vs RDFN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a Hold and RDFN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRDFN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RDFN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FOR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDFN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FOR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RDFN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while RDFN (@Real Estate Development) price change was -9.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
FOR is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
RDFN is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (-1.07% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| FOR | RDFN | FOR / RDFN | |
| Capitalization | 1.99B | 782M | 254% |
| EBITDA | 230M | -53.04M | -434% |
| Gain YTD | -12.579 | -22.771 | 55% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.84 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.53B | 977M | 156% |
| Total Cash | 459M | 192M | 239% |
| Total Debt | 714M | 1.01B | 71% |
FOR | RDFN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FOR's Valuation (72) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RDFN (84). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to RDFN’s over the last 12 months.
FOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDFN (100). This means that FOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDFN’s over the last 12 months.
FOR's SMR Rating (60) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDFN (100). This means that FOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDFN’s over the last 12 months.
RDFN's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FOR (74). This means that RDFN’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.
FOR's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RDFN (100). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to RDFN’s over the last 12 months.
| FOR | RDFN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 72% | 10 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 70% | 10 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 70% | 10 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 70% | 10 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 75% | 10 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 0% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 10 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 76% | 10 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 90% |
FOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOR has been loosely correlated with OPEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOR jumps, then OPEN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOR | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| OPEN - FOR | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| LSEA - FOR | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| RDFN - FOR | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| STHO - FOR | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| HHH - FOR | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||
RDFN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDFN has been closely correlated with OPEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RDFN jumps, then OPEN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RDFN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDFN | 100% | -1.85% | ||
| OPEN - RDFN | 68% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| HOUS - RDFN | 68% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| COMP - RDFN | 67% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| RMAX - RDFN | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| JOE - RDFN | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More | ||||