FOR
Price
$18.93
Change
-$0.11 (-0.58%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
93 days until earnings call
OPEN
Price
$0.95
Change
+$0.02 (+2.15%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.06B
16 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FOR vs OPEN

Header iconFOR vs OPEN Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs OPENBanner chart's image
Forestar Group
Price$18.93
Change-$0.11 (-0.58%)
Volume$409K
Capitalization1.99B
Opendoor Technologies
Price$0.95
Change+$0.02 (+2.15%)
Volume$19.5M
Capitalization2.06B
FOR vs OPEN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. OPEN commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a Hold and OPEN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FOR: $18.93 vs. OPEN: $0.95)
Brand notoriety: FOR and OPEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 187% vs. OPEN: 44%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. OPEN: $2.06B
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. OPEN’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOPEN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OPEN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FOR and OPEN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPEN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OPEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FOR and OPEN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.22% price change this week, while OPEN (@Real Estate Development) price change was -3.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

OPEN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.10% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OPEN($2.06B) and FOR($1.99B) have the same market capitalization . FOR YTD gains are higher at: -26.968 vs. OPEN (-40.381). FOR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 230M vs. OPEN (9M). OPEN has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. FOR (459M). FOR has less debt than OPEN: FOR (714M) vs OPEN (2.53B). OPEN has higher revenues than FOR: OPEN (6.95B) vs FOR (1.53B).
FOROPENFOR / OPEN
Capitalization1.99B2.06B97%
EBITDA230M9M2,556%
Gain YTD-26.968-40.38167%
P/E Ratio10.84N/A-
Revenue1.53B6.95B22%
Total Cash459M1.07B43%
Total Debt714M2.53B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOROPEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

FOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOR has been loosely correlated with OPEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOR jumps, then OPEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOR
1D Price
Change %
FOR100%
-0.58%
OPEN - FOR
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
JOE - FOR
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
LSEA - FOR
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
CWK - FOR
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
STRS - FOR
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.38%
More

OPEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPEN has been loosely correlated with COMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OPEN jumps, then COMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPEN
1D Price
Change %
OPEN100%
+2.90%
COMP - OPEN
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.95%
RMAX - OPEN
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
JLL - OPEN
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
HOUS - OPEN
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
RDFN - OPEN
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
More