FOR
Price
$22.76
Change
-$0.28 (-1.22%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
53 days until earnings call
LSEA
Price
$8.22
Change
-$0.18 (-2.14%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
508.99M
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FOR vs LSEA

Header iconFOR vs LSEA Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs LSEABanner chart's image
Forestar Group
Price$22.76
Change-$0.28 (-1.22%)
Volume$161.56K
Capitalization1.99B
Landsea Homes
Price$8.22
Change-$0.18 (-2.14%)
Volume$205.65K
Capitalization508.99M
FOR vs LSEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. LSEA commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a StrongBuy and LSEA is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FOR: $23.64 vs. LSEA: $8.52)
Brand notoriety: FOR and LSEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 144% vs. LSEA: 68%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. LSEA: $508.99M
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. LSEA’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $508.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLSEA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LSEA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LSEA is a better buy in the long-term than FOR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSEA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LSEA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOR is a better buy in the short-term than LSEA.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +2.60% price change this week, while LSEA (@Real Estate Development) price change was +3.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

LSEA is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.91% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOR($1.99B) has a higher market cap than LSEA($509M). LSEA has higher P/E ratio than FOR: LSEA (18.84) vs FOR (10.84). LSEA YTD gains are higher at: 0.353 vs. FOR (-8.796). FOR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 230M vs. LSEA (45.4M). FOR has more cash in the bank: 459M vs. LSEA (120M). LSEA has less debt than FOR: LSEA (557M) vs FOR (714M). FOR has higher revenues than LSEA: FOR (1.53B) vs LSEA (1.21B).
FORLSEAFOR / LSEA
Capitalization1.99B509M390%
EBITDA230M45.4M507%
Gain YTD-8.7960.353-2,489%
P/E Ratio10.8418.8458%
Revenue1.53B1.21B126%
Total Cash459M120M383%
Total Debt714M557M128%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR vs LSEA: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
LSEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
719
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
6285
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8463
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8151
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOR's Valuation (70) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as LSEA (77) in the null industry. This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to LSEA’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as LSEA (100) in the null industry. This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to LSEA’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's SMR Rating (62) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as LSEA (85) in the null industry. This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to LSEA’s over the last 12 months.

LSEA's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as FOR (84) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that LSEA’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

LSEA's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FOR (81) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that LSEA’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORLSEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

FOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOR has been loosely correlated with OPEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOR jumps, then OPEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOR
1D Price
Change %
FOR100%
+1.68%
OPEN - FOR
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
LSEA - FOR
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
STHO - FOR
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
RDFN - FOR
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
CWK - FOR
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
More

LSEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSEA has been loosely correlated with FOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LSEA jumps, then FOR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSEA
1D Price
Change %
LSEA100%
+0.12%
FOR - LSEA
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
JLL - LSEA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
OPEN - LSEA
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
STHO - LSEA
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
HOUS - LSEA
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
More